The Frank Family That Survived: Chapter 2

An excerpt from Gordon Sander’s book, The Frank Family That Survived.

CHAPTER 2

Ultra-Dada Days

A terrorist revolution under the leadership of Dr Liebknecht, the Radical Socialist, will break out Friday evening, according to reports. Liebknecht, the reports say, has 15,000 men well-armed. The population of Berlin is at the mercy of gangs of marauders, and there appears to be no authority there.

The New York Times, 5 December 1918

There comes a moment in the life of every man, be he good or bad, when appalled by the monotony and drabness of his daily life, his soul yearns for something different - he longs for the unknown, for the glamour and excitement he imagines to be the lot of the other man; the man in the street.

The opening text from the German melodramatic film, The Street (1923)

Jedermann sei eigner Fussball

Title of a German dadaist publication from

the early 1920s, meaning 'Everyman his own

football'

The 1905 edition of Baedeker's Berlin, written when the ancient settlement on the river Spree was coming into its own as one of Europe's great cities, if not yet Germany's capital, draws an inviting portrait of a dynamic, light-dappled city, a young city, a city on the move.

Berlin's transformation from a minor crossroads into the great metropolis of central Europe, with a population - then - of just over three million, had been a quick one. As late as 1860, when the city contained fewer than 800,000 people, Henry Adams, the well-known American writer, and diplomat, described Berlin, still laboring in the shadows of its more successful sister city, the port of Hamburg, as a "poor provincial town - simple, dirty, uncivilised, and in most respects disgusting. Not anymore. 'Almost every part of Berlin offers a pleasing picture, declared the German guidebook writer. 

Its streets enjoy model cleanliness. There are few dark lanes or alleys even in the oldest parts of the city. Nearly all the newer houses have balconies, gay in summer with flowers and foliage. The public squares are embellished with gardens, monuments, and fountains. The centres of traffic, with their network of railway lines, and the navigation on the river, offer scenes of remarkable animation.

It is a new city, the newest I have ever seen,' rhapsodized Mark Twain, the American writer, who visited booming post-Bismarck Berlin several times. To Twain, the Midwesterner, the bustling, new-fangled Berlin of the 1890s and early 1900s reminded him most of America's then metropolis-on-the-move, Chicago, although he liked Berlin even more.

Like many foreigners, Twain was most taken with the city's enormous boulevards. Unter den Linden and the Kurfürstendamm had been built

wide by Frederick the Great in order to accommodate military manoeuvres, but now, like the Champs Elysées or Fifth Avenue, had taken on a life of their own. Only parts of Chicago are stately and beautiful,' enthused Twain, whereas all of Berlin is stately and substantial, and it is not merely in parts but uniformly beautiful.' 

Above all, alongside the 'new Berlin's contagious energy and 'animation', there was peace and order and a respect for old values - Einechristliche Weltanschauung, as Germans say. This was the beguiling, even if somewhat staid, pre-1914 Berlin, the Berlin of the Kaiserzeit, before the Kaiser and his armies, including several hundred thousand patriotic Berliners - and thousands of equally patriotic German-Jewish Berliners - marched off to war and the abyss.

But in March 1919 that Berlin was quite dead. George Renwick, correspondent for The New York Times, found the Großstadt - the Great City- still dazed from the recent upheaval, as well as suffering from the extended Allied food blockade. "The civil strife in Lichtenberg' - an eastern district of Berlin, where thousands of left-wing 'Spartacist fighters had died fighting the right-wing Freikorps army units who (somewhat incongruously) had come to the aid of the shaky five-month-old Social Democratic-led republic - was, the American hopefully noted,  ‘most at an end. There [is] evidence of increasing order. The trains [are) working and the underground trains [are] running.

Still, taking a taxi through the city, Renwick was taken aback by the contrast between the gloomy city he found and the upbeat one he once knew:

…Then began a ride through a phantom city for that describes Berlin today. The streets and long avenues were dimly lighted, and boys were dashing on roller skates. Shadowy people moved slowly about aimlessly, it would appear.

Now and then I heard the hoarse call of some street vendor.

The benign, light-dappled Wilhelmian Berlin was now a dark, menacing place where many buildings still bore bullet holes from the recent street battles between the well-trained, well-armed Freikorps and the reds, whose leaders, Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg, had been shot and bludgeoned in the Hotel Eden and dumped in the Tiergarten (not far from where the Franks would shortly set up house) just a few weeks before. Luxemburg's bloated, unrecognizable body turned up floating in the Landwehr Canal. It was a hungry, disease-ridden city: the cruelly extended Allied blockade had only just been lifted after the victors had extorted massive payments from the prostrate Germans in return for resuming emergency food shipments, a precursor of the vindictiveness shortly to emanate from the Versailles Peace Conference; the frightening, macabre city that was the inspiration for the soon-to-be-released silent film, The Cabinet of Dr Calgari, in which Cesare, cinema's first zombie, blindly follows his murderous master's voice and kidnaps an innocent young woman - presumably a Berliner - and carries her over the city rooftops like King Kong until, somewhat inscrutably, he drops dead from exhaustion. But there is no logic to these things. 

Neither was there much logic to postwar Berlin, where the self-proclaimed "dada' artist George Grosz celebrated the void with his scabrous, unforgettable etchings of the city, with power-hungry right-wing generals and monocled capitalists milling contentedly about while veterans begged for change. The new, nihilistic art/anti-art movement had taken the nonsense word 'dada' for its unlikely name. Grosz himself

carried a mocking but accurate banner: DADA ÜBER ALLES.

  "Not now brightly lighted cafés and restaurants, brilliant streets, and the crush of traffic,' bemoaned the stricken Renwick. Overall was an underworld gloom. How different all this was when compared with the bright and busy lights of Berlin before the war!'

Just beneath Renwick's depressing report was an equally apocalyptic dispatch from the Associated Press noting that Germany's food stocks would be exhausted by the end of May.

This was the Berlin that greeted Myrtil Frank in December of that tumultuous first postwar year when he moved into his new flat in Brückenallee, a leafy street just off the Tiergarten, and prepared to take up his duties as one of the newly hired managers of the all-important municipal food rationing office.

To be sure, the very fact of the storm-tossed republic's continued existence itself was no small miracle. In June, just as the echoes of the last shots of the Spartacist revolt had died away, the government and the country were shocked by the promulgation of the terms agreed upon at Versailles as the final price of peace. Amongst the many onerous provisions of the treaty - or Diktat, as the document was quickly dubbed were requirements that Germany cede Alsace-Lorraine back to France. No great surprise there - but also the Saar, Upper Silesia, and other parts of her territory, as well as all the former German colonies.

Additionally, under the terms of Versailles, the German army would be reduced to a rump force of 100,000. On and on the humiliating terms went, as Germans read with dismay. The German air force would be abolished. The Rhineland, including the Palatinate, was to be demilitarised and occupied by French troops: the Hünsruck, the Franks and their Breitenheim neighbours learned would soon be swarming with Zouaves.

Only in the creation of a League of Nations to arbitrate future conflicts was the influence of Woodrow Wilson's idealistic Fourteen Points seen. However, in the terms specifically regarding Germany, the vengeful British and the even more vengeful French had already won the day.

All this was bad enough. But the provisos that stuck the most in Germany's collective craw were Articles 227 to 232, the so-called honor clauses, particularly 231, the 'war guilt clause', which declared Germany responsible "for causing all the loss and damage' suffered by the Allies, strongly implying that she was solely responsible for the war. Article 231 was used to justify the next clause, 232, which created a commission to determine reparations - eventually set at the ludicrous figure of 132 billion gold marks, about 32 billion gold dollars. Germans were outraged. Certainly, few believed that Germany was solely responsible for the war. Here, ready-made was Hitler's soapbox.

As Herbert Hoover, the head of the American relief mission (and future US president) noted: Hate crawled in [to the Versailles negotiations] with demands for punishment, revenge, indemnities, and reparations ... We and our world must live with these seventy million Germans. Hoover, who, ironically, would be cast out of office by American voters in 1932 for his own perceived callousness, went on to caution, 'No matter how deeply we may feel at the present moment, our vision must stretch over the next hundred years.'

But Hoover's idealistic vision, as well as Wilson's original one, failed at Versailles. Hatred triumphed. The hatred would be returned.

The provisional government in Weimar was thrown into turmoil by the publication of the proposed terms. 'What hand would not wither that binds itself and us in these fetters?' cried Philipp Scheidemann, its first president, who had declared the 'accidental' republic six months before; he resigned rather than sign the offending document. Only an ultimatum from Paris that made it plain that the Allies were prepared to invade Germany brought a reluctant German delegation - including a brave German Jew, Matthias Erzburger, who was vilified and then assassinated for his efforts - to sign the Diktat on 28 June 1919.

In August the still-concussed government's prestige was bolstered by the formal promulgation of the new ultra-democratic (if perhaps not entirely thought through) Weimar constitution. Combining elements drawn from both the American presidential system and the British and French parliamentary ones, the highly idealistic document, drafted by Hugo Preuss - a professor of law at the University of Berlin, a liberal and another Jew - included provisions for popular initiative and referendum, as well as : a strong president elected by the whole people, and a chancellor responsible to the legislature.

Unfortunately, the Weimar constitution also contained the means of its own demise, including provisions for the autonomy of local state governments - which would soon allow Bavarian state authorities to allow the Nazis to flourish under their lenient rule - and, more fatally, Article 48, which empowered the president to rule by decree, the same provision which would eventually lead to the installation in the Chancellery of a one-time Austrian corporal named Adolf Hitler, then recovering from his wounds in hospital, and the end of the democratic Second Reich.

At the time, however, the new constitution seemed to offer Germany the basis for a new start. In September, the new republican advisers, deeming it safe to come back to the capital, if not quite safe enough to hold national elections, returned to Berlin from Weimar to - gently - take up the reins.

But Berlin wasn't really safe yet, either for governments or for ordinary people. The food distribution system that Myrtil had been hired to help straighten out was still hopelessly fouled-up. In August, to cite but one example of the ambient chaos, 75,000 food retailers closed their shops to protest at the imminent commercialisation of food supplies. There were

dozens of other strikes, some serious, some frivolous. Street crime was rampant. Karl Baedeker's gay, animated Berlin was gone. This, now, was Dr Caligari's Berlin, and it would remain so for some time.

Brückenallee, the once elegant street near the Tiergarten where Myrtil had found an apartment for Flory and himself, was somewhat grim. If one looked around, one could still find bullet holes from the recent rebellion. There were plenty of ghosts. 

Not long before, during the war, the leafy street had reverberated with the sound of hearses ferrying the coffins of the war dead from the nearby Bellevue tram station. At night, this morbid spectacle had been followed by the spine-chilling cries of the animals at the once great, now abandoned Berlin zoo, being killed and devoured by starving Germans. If one listened closely enough, the Franks' neighbours swore, you could still hear the bellowing beasts.

All in all, it was not the most auspicious place to begin a new life. But the Franks refused to be disheartened. Myrtil's new, responsible position with the Berlin food administration was his chance, their chance too, and with Flory's backing, he resolved to give it everything he had, chaos be damned.

The first few years of the Weimar Republic - 1920, 1921, 1922 - coincided with the first few years of the Franks' married lives, as well as their lives as independent adults and as bona fide Berliners. It was a happy and exciting period, a flourishing in the void. In the outside

world, the world of everyday Berlin, dada - chaos - still ruled all, but inside their world, at Brückenallee 4, things were fairly gemütlich.

  Myrtil's work with the city food administration continued to be arduous, as he and his fellow logistical workers did their best to distribute the poorly coordinated supplies they received while coping with the chaos. Despite his and his staff's energetic efforts to keep Berlin fed, the general social and economic situation continued to be extremely volatile and the prospect of a complete breakdown in the system was never far away.

In January 1920, a month after Myrtil began his logistical duties, The New York Times reported that, as a result of late-arriving rural food stocks, the food situation in the capital remained 'critical'. Another Spartacist revolt was imminent, the paper reported.

  Somehow, however, the desperately needed supplies were found, transported, and distributed. Although Berliners - including both the general citizenry and the food merchants who had to comply with the new rationing rules - continued to grumble, there was no recurrence of the food riots that had ravaged the city the previous autumn. Catastrophe was averted. The Spartacists, or what was left of them, stayed at home.

Nevertheless, the threat of mass famine continued to hang over Berlin, and over the work of Myrtil and other senior food officials, for some time. The sight of Berlin families rummaging through the rubbish in order to supplement their meager rations was common throughout the early 1920s. In January 1921, a then-noted Swiss-based observer of world affairs by the name of F. Forster publicly declared that because of the continued shortages Germany was on the verge of anarchy. Should Germany continue to suffer so acutely from underfeeding,' the professor warned, 'she will develop into a terrible powder magazine, threatening all Europe.' The near-famine conditions of the early 1920s, which were to a great degree the direct result of Allied spite (a factor in explaining why that shameful episode is all but forgotten in the West today) - the same dreadful conditions that Myrtil and his fellow workers labored to ameliorate were amongst the underlying resentments that eventually led to the Nazi explosion.

In the meantime, according to the same article that carried Dr. Foerster's doomsday prediction, at least one eminent Berlin physician was advising young Berliners that it was their duty not "to bring children into such a world? Such a world, indeed. 

The writer Ilya Ehrenburg, one of the many Russian artists and intellectuals who traveled to Berlin during the immediate postwar period a distinguished group that included such luminaries as painter Wassily Kandinsky, who joined the inaugural faculty of the avant-garde Bauhaus school in Weimar, as well as others - was shocked by the violence and misery he found when he arrived in Berlin in 1921. The Germans were living as though they were at a railway station,' the amazed Russian wrote. 'No one knew what would happen from one day to the next. Shopkeepers changed their price tickets every day: the mark was falling. Herds of foreigners wandered along the Kurfürstendamm: they were buying up the remnants of former luxury for a song.‘

However, factory chimneys continued to smoke, bookkeepers neatly Wrote out astronomical figures, and prostitutes painstakingly made up their faces. At every turn, there were small Diele, dance halls, where lean couples conscientiously jiggled up and down. Jazz blared. Popular songs proclaimed: 'Yes, we have no bananas, and 'Tomorrow's the end of the world'. However, the end of the world was postponed from one day to the next.

And Myrtil and Flory were never happier, or more in love. Frustrating though Myrtil's job at the rationing office might be at times, it also empowered him. It was distressing, of course, to pass the line of crippled veterans selling matches or begging for change on Friedrichstrasse every day, as he went to work. Still, as Myrtil calculated the logistics of feeding Berlin - his Berlin - he felt he was making a contribution. Moreover, the pay wasn't bad. And every day he was making new connections, connections that would stand him in good stead in the career he wanted: as a stockbroker on the Berlin exchange.

All in all, it was not bad for a young whippersnapper, particularly a Jew out of Breitenheim. When Myrtil arrived home, after walking the short distance from the Bellevue tram station, he was, more often than not, in an upbeat mood, and so was his beautiful young wife.

These were also the years when Myrtil and Flory got to know each other for the first time. There were some surprises, most of them nice.

For one thing, as Flory found, her leonine husband was still in touch with his silly side, a rarity in such a serious man. In years to come, Myrtil would entertain his grandchildren by placing a silver tray on his head for no particular reason and walking around; now he performed similar stunts for Flory. He also had a huge, yelping laugh that seemed to come out of nowhere. When 'Til was business, he was all business, but when he wasn't, he was game for anything and his eyes shone with a slightly manic glee.

Flory had her own quirks, as Myrtil similarly discovered. Already a born optimist, she was a fan of autosuggestion - or self-conscious auto-

suggestion, as it was technically called - the popular system of self-help that was all the rage then in Europe and America, particularly amongst suggestible young middle-class women. Devised by the French pharmacist Emile Coué, this easy-to-use, if somewhat fatuous system of self-help - a precursor of today's positive thinking - revolved around the

repeated use of the lullaby-like phrase: Day by day, in every way, I am getting better and better. Flory's extreme aestheticism, the legacy of her teenage Parisian sortie, was also an aid of sorts. When she wasn't playing the piano, the musically inclined young Frankfurt native liked to hum. Flory was a great hummer. She also loved to decorate. This was welcome, except when her husband's more garish and her somewhat more sedate tastes clashed. On

the rare occasion when this occurred, Myrtil, in awe of his wife in many ways, was happy to defer to her more educated judgement. After all she had spent a year in Paris!

    It was not a perfect match - Myrtil's easy-going personality jarred somewhat with Flory's more conservative, controlling one - but it was a good one, and would remain so for some time. If the high-spirited Myrtil was schnapps, to put it in bibulous terms, Flory was Dubonnet. And together they made quite a party.

If all else failed, the Franks could also join the growing number of Berliners who chose to escape reality by going to the cinema. If postwar Berlin was jazz-mad, it was also movie-mad, taking to the new-fangled medium with gold-rush-like enthusiasm: in 1919, while the social fabric of revolutionary Berlin came close to disintegrating, dozens of movie

palaces were erected around the city, lavish sanctuaries in which the anxiety-ridden masses could lose themselves for an hour or two as the

silent images flickered before them, more often than not to live musical accompaniment.

Premièring in 1920, the aforementioned Cabinet of Dr Caligari was a hit with the young cinema-going audience. Even more popular, however- and more to Flory's classical tastes, when they attended the opulent Palast am Zoo located nearby - were the great historical epics, like Madame du Barry and The Loves of Pharaoh, which the renowned director Ernst Lubitsch had created for UFA, the pioneering Berlin film studio. Otto Friedrich writes in his bestselling 1972 book Before the Deluge:

Almost every day in the streets of Berlin ... there were crowds of demonstrators marching to and fro for one cause or another, but inside the shelter of the UFA Palast am Zoo, where a symphony orchestra of seventy musicians provided the accompaniment, Berliners could escape into an imaginary world in which Lubitsch's crowds were storming an artificial Berlin, or besieging an artificial Tower of London.

The Franks had each other. This was important, particularly on those occasions when the once reliable city lights really did go out, as they briefly did during the five-day-long Kapp Putsch.

In 1919 it had been the revolutionary left's turn to try to seize the government. It was only a matter of time before the revolutionary right attempted to do the same thing. On 13 March 1920, Berlin and the world were startled to learn that a group of right-wing soldiers, led by an obscure politician named Wolfgang Kapp, had seized the Chancellery and set up machine-gun posts around the governmental district. Backing Kapp was the veteran Ehrhardt Brigade, a battle-hardened unit which had fought in the Baltic during the Great War, and had also seen service as a Freikorps unit during the suppression of the Spartacist rebellion. The rebels also reportedly had the support of General Ludendorff, the German commander during the Great War, still acting very much his old imperious self.

On the day that the attempted coup d'état took place, the displaced republican government called a general strike. To its surprise and delight, the strike was heeded, as the unions, left-wing militants, the government

and Berliners themselves combined to put the coup down. Berlin was already used to strikes, but this was the first time absolutely nothing worked. Not even the movies. For five days Berliners stayed at home, read by daylight and dined by candlelight. 

In the end the Kapp Putsch proved more opéra bouffe than coup d'état. The hapless Kapp, who had no experience of government (as manifested by his decision to dissolve and un-dissolve the Prussian State Legislature on the same day), spent most of his time walking around the darkened, abandoned government offices in a semi-daze, before being persuaded to give up and fly to Sweden.

'If only we had shot more people every thing would have been all right,' one soldier who supported the short-lived coup said later.

    On 20 May 1920, the day after Kapp flew into Swedish exile with his sobbing wife, the men of the Ehrhardt Brigade (whose battle flag was adorned with the diminutive pre-Nazi swastika) dutifully filed out of the government compound, lustily singing their barracks songs, just as they had done when they had entered five days before.

The failure of the Kapp Putsch gave Ebert, the Socialist chancellor, a last chance to carry out basic, desperately needed reforms in the civil service and armed services. Nonetheless, these changes were only partly popular with the German public, which was still divided between left and right. The government coalition failed to win a majority in the June 1920 elections, resulting in a divided Reichstag, the first of the divided Reichstags that would burden the doomed republic for the remainder of its thirteen-year existence.

But the republic survived; the end of the world was postponed. And the thin, love-possessed couples at the Diele continued to dance away to the tune of 'Yes, we have no bananas'

On 27 December 1920, Myrtil's twenty-seventh birthday, Flory presented him with their first child, a daughter. An Anglophile and a Francophile, the internationally minded (but still deeply patriotic) Flory decided to name her brown-haired, hazel-eyed daughter Dorrit, after

Little Dorrit by Charles Dickens, one of her favourite books: a gesture of true Anglo-German rapprochement.

True to her Dickensian roots, the Franks' beautiful daughter, who was soon gleefully waddling around the big apartment at Brückenallee 4, would turn out to be the great romantic of the family. Outspoken, strong- willed, temperamental, adorable: Dorrit was an admixture of her high-spirited father and her grande dame-like mother. Cassandra-like physicians be damned: Flory and Myrtil were very glad that they had decided to bring such a sparkling child into their world.

  Still, certain worrying developments in the world beyond the Hansa Viertal or Hansa Quarter, as their smart neighbourhood was called, could not be wished away, notably the return of anti-Semitism to German public life.

This pernicious development coincided with a rise in anti-Semitism both in Europe and worldwide. This was the same period when Henry Ford, the brilliant industrialist and rabid Jew-hater, was frequently proclaiming his belief in The Protocols of Zion - the counterfeit nineteenth-century document supposedly 'proving' that Jews were linked with an ancient conspiracy to take over the world - in the pages of his friendly home-town newspaper, The Dearborn Independent. Many Americans believed him.

Meanwhile, Eastern Europe was consumed by a new wave of anti-Semitic fervour. In Hungary, so-called 'white terror' gangs attacked Jews on the streets of Budapest, while the avowedly anti-Semitic government ordered the expulsion of all Jews who had entered since 1914. Poland, historically the country most receptive to anti-Semitism, was racked by such pogroms, as was Czechoslovakia.

In heady, 'anything goes', democratic Weimar, Jews were no longer held back, but they were no longer protected by the power of the Crown as they had been under Bismarck and the Kaiser. There was more opportunity than ever before - witness Myrtil's fairly prominent position, for example - but there was also more exposure.

Attacks on Jews in public - when the attackers were sure they had a bona fide Jew in their clutches - were commonplace during this turbulent time, as a German Jew by the name of Conrad Rosenstein relates in his memoir:

I was on a train one night on my way home from Frankfurt. The train was pitch dark. The lights were out, nothing uncommon after the war when German railroads were in utter disrepair and few things functioned orderly. It was either in 1919 or 1920, during one of the early periods of violent anti-Semitic acts which might occur anywhere, and when a Jew who had the guts to fight could become embroiled in a vicious brawl. It happened often enough on a train and it was difficult not to react to the slander and the smears poured over you. That night, we were seven or eight people in the dark, fourth-class compartment, sitting in utter silence till one of the men started the usual refrain: 'Those God-damned Jews, they are the root of all our troubles.'

Enraged, Rosenstein challenged the bullies in the dark with the fact that he was a Jew.

That was the signal they needed. Now they really went after me, threatening me physically. I didn't hold my tongue as the argument went back and forth. They began jostling me till one of them next to me and near the door, probably more encouraged by the darkness than by his own valour, suggested: Let's throw the Jew out of the train.'

At which point Rosenstein wisely decided not to provoke them further.

   Attacks on Jewish public officials - and not merely verbal ones - also escalated during this incendiary period. Were three quarters of the

German nation still on the side of the Jews and against the anti-Semites, as Rickert had so loudly asserted in the Reichstag forty years before? It was getting hard for Jews to tell.

  One anti-Semitic attack that threatened the fragility of the Weimar Republic was the cold-blooded murder in June 1922 of Walther Rathenau, then the German Foreign Minister.

   The noted industrialist and Renaissance man had not initally rallied to the republic nor vice versa. At the 1919 constitutional assembly, a move to nominate Rathenau as president produced jeers from the right. Stricken, the great man withdrew his name. The Parliament of any other civilised state would have shown sufficient respect for a man of recognised intellectual standing; he protested, somewhat preciously. But the Parliament of the German republic greeted (me] with roars and shrieks of laughter.’

  Nevertheless, Rathenau, who helped the German Democratic Party, was a convinced democrat, and the new goverment found that it could not spare his gifts for long. In May 1921 he became Minister of Reconstruction, and in January 1922 was appointed Foreign Minister. He became a symbol for the republic, and, as its most eminent Jew, the perfect scapegoat for German nationalists who were disgruntled with it, as well as those who wished to avenge the alleged Jewish-perpetrated 'stab-in-the-back' that had led to the humiliation of Versailles.

  Rathenau's policies only increased resentment against him from the right. In his controversial first speech to the Reichstag as Minister of Reconstruction, he advocated fulfilment of Germany's obligations under Versailles, however distasteful, as the best means of 'linking up with the world again'. He continued his programme of linking up with the outer world, including Germany's former enemies, by signing the Treaty of Rapallo with the Soviet Union, thus re-establishing economic and political relations with its ex-foe. A deft move, the treaty signified Germany's re-emergence as an independent agent in the arena of foreign affairs.

     Unfortunately, by linking arms with the same Bolshevik government that had sponsored the Spartacists, he also opened himself up to criti-

cism from the right that he was some sort of Communist agent - in addition to being a Jew. As it turned out, the far-sighted rapprochement with the Soviets - which, ironically, in the light of conservative opposition, wound up playing a catalytic role in German rearmament, as the Soviets secretly began to help the Reich rebuild its military - turned out to be the German-Jewish diplomat's death warrant.

By the spring of 1922, Rathenau had become the target of numerous death threats. In May, Karl Wirth, then the German Chancellor, was distressed to receive confirmed intelligence of a murder plot against his idealistic Foreign Minister. Worried, Wirth shared the news with Rathenau, insisting that the latter accept police protection. After a long

pause to take in the news, Rathenau refused. 'Dear friend,' he reassured Wirth, putting both of his hands on the worried Chancellor's shoulders, 'it is nothing. Who would do me harm?'

On the morning of 24 June 1922, as Rathenau was being driven to work in his open car from his villa in Grunemald, a group of three

Freikorps veterans, led by a rabid former naval lieutenant by the name of Erwin Kern, shot him as they passed in another vehicle, and tossed a

grenade at the mortally wounded politician for good measure.

Rathenau's murder, Weimar's equivalent of the Kennedy assassination. stunned Germany. This atrocious crime has struck not only Rathenan declaimed President Ebert in his oration to the fallen cabinet minister, "but the German people!' An estimated two million Berliners - more than half the city's population - lined Rathenau's funeral route or marched in simultaneous protest. As historian David Lange writes, Jews and Gentiles alike understood that the fragile new republic couldn't afford to lose true patriots like him.

     Amongst the Berliners who lined Rathenau's funeral route were Flory and Myrtil Frank. For cultured and assimilated Jews like the Franks, the murder of Rathenau - the ultimate child of German Bildung - was earth-shaking. For the first time in their adult lives, the Franks felt unsafe as Jews in Germany.

That same year, ruinous hyperinflation destroyed the German currency. In July, the mark, already battered by Germany's economic and political unrest, stood at 670 to the dollar, compared with 331 a mere few weeks before.

The republican government, in an understandable, if not particularly well-thought-out desire to act against the French government, which was still occupying the Ruhr Valley, decided to subsidize 'passive resistance to the occupation by paying the salaries of striking workers there. However, the Weimar treasury, already near-bankrupt from the strain of reparations, had nothing to back up the specie it continued to print.

The mark now went into freefall. In February it hit 12,000 to the dollar and that was only the start. By August, it hit a million - and kept going. A tram ride that had cost 3,000 marks in July soon cost 10,000; then 50,000; then 100,000. Restaurant prices changed while diners were in the middle of their meals. If anyone needed the proof that dada truly ruled

in Germany, this was it.

Middle-class citizens who lived on a fixed income and had dutifully put their money into savings accounts simply couldn't keep up. A few didn't even try. In a typical horror story, a disconsolate Berlin writer was said to have spent his entire life savings on a last subway ride through the city. Then he went home and starved himself to death. 

Amongst those patriotic, hard-working Germans who were wiped out by the galloping inflation was Max Frank, who was now forced to sell the family vineyard, a move that doubtless hastened his death several years later at the relatively young age of sixty-three.

Taking in the chaos around him - including his father's bankruptcy- Myrtil in October 1923 carefully packed his wife and two-year-old daughter into a waiting taxi, accompanied them to the train station and placed them on an express train for Lugano, the Swiss resort, where he had arranged for them to stay in a chalet for the duration. Remaining behind - after all, he still needed to try to make a living - he promised to telegraph once things calmed down.

But the madness continued. At the beginning of November, the mark stood at a billion to the dollar.

Some tried to lay the blame for the tragic economic state of affairs at the doorstep of Berlin's growing Jewish community, particularly the large number of conspicuously unassimilated Jews from Eastern Europe who

had recently settled in Berlin. Retaining their distinctive dress, speech and customs, the so called Ostjuden settled in Berlin's Scheunenviertel during the early 1920s, turning it into a kind of ghetto, and making themselves an anti-Semitic lightning rod.

‘In addition to finding the Ostjuden distasteful,' Lange writes, Berlin's assimilated Jews worried that this highly noticeable community might fan the fires of anti-Semitism, perhaps provoking the kind of pogrom-like violence that Germany had hitherto avoided.' And so they did. On 5 November 1923, a pogrom-like riot broke out in the old Jewish quarter, as scores of enraged unemployed men fell upon the bearded residents, who they believed - falsely - had bought up the funds guaranteeing their jobless benefits at usurious rates.

Up and up the mark soared, while down below chaos reigned. 'Now,' writes historian Sebastian Haffner in his poignant memoir, Defying Hitler, 'we expected the downfall of the state, even the dissolution of the Reich. There had never been so many rumours: the Rhineland had seceded; the Kaiser [then in exile in Holland] had come back; the French had marched in. It was difficult to distinguish the possible from the impossible. People disappeared [by] the dozens ... Saviours appeared everywhere, people with long hair and hair shirts declaring that they had been sent by God to save the world.'

By now the mark had virtually disappeared. Sojourning in Hamburg that month, the American painter Marsden Hartley, fascinated and appalled at Germany's collective nervous breakdown, wrote a letter to his friend Alfred Stieglitz on the back of three ten-million-mark notes; he told Stieglitz that it was cheaper to do that than to use regular stationery.

Faster and faster the couples at the Diele danced. Perhaps, they shrugged, tomorrow indeed would be the end of the world.

On 15 November the mark stood at 4.2 billion to the dollar. Three days later, in what seemed to many a poor replay of the Kapp Putsch, Adolf Hitler, the corporal-turned-politician, made his first appearance on the German political stage, issuing a call for a national right-wing revolution in a beer hall in Munich. The self-proclaimed revolutionary and avenger of Versailles managed to get a few of his fledgling National Socialist Party comrades killed before he was hauled away by the Bavarian police. He wore short hair rather than long, but he didn't seem all that different from the other wild-eyed saviours who had preceded him.

THE HUNDRED DAY WINTER WAR: Chapter 1

An excerpt from Gordon Sander’s book, The Hundred Day Winter War

THE HUNDRED DAY WINTER WAR

Chapter One

"A Wild Day”

November 30, 1939

RUSSIANS START THEIR INVASION OF FINLAND

PLANES DROP BOMBS ON AIRFIELD AT HELSINKI

WAR STARTS AS U.S. MOVE FOR PEACE IS MADE

New York Times, November 30, 1939

I remember everything quite clearly. My memories are so clear they still torture me sometimes. When it's cold and snowy, I can picture myself in those trenches like it was yesterday.

-Dr. Eric Malm, who served as a platoon leader

with the 10th Finnish Regiment on the Mannerheim Line

What do I remember the most from the war? It was the incompetence of our army, as it could not deal with a handful of Finns in a proper manner and in good time. They [the Finns] showed us how to fight a war.

-Georgi V. Prusakov, Soviet medic who fought the war with the 100th Independent Volunteer Ski Battalion

Invading armies rarely signal their intentions with music, but something like that occurred on the afternoon of November 29, 1939, at the border village of Alakurtti, in eastern Lapland. The Finnish frontier guards stationed there that day were astonished to see a Soviet military band, in full regalia, suddenly appear out of the gloaming on the forest road leading to the Russian and Finnish customs barriers. Marching right up to the gate, the khaki-adorned orchestra suddenly stood fast. Then at a signal from the bandmaster, the musicians proceeded to play "The Internationale."

Uncertain how to respond, one of the perplexed Finnish frontier guards called up the commander of the area, Colonel Vila Villamo, a genial warrior who had been commander of the area since the Finnish Civil War twenty years before,and held the receiver out of the window so the former could hear the uninvited Red serenaders. Upon hearing the old Communist call to arms, the alarmed officer ordered the head guard of the normally sleepy outposts to issue ammunition and stand ready for anything. And so the tense guards did, as the musical berserkers proceeded to play an entire program of Soviet militant gut once again guards, as well as the trees, before disappearing into the twilight once again.

Villamo’s instincts proved sound: the very next morning, the Finns suffered some of their first dead at Alakurtti, by then, the entire country was under attack.

Winter War/2

The longest day in the history of modern Helsinki began quietly enough. Christian Ilmoni, a student at Helsinki University, was walking down Stenbackinkatu, a quiet residential street in the center of town, when he saw the first Soviet Tupolev SB-2 bombers plummet out of the low clouds covering the dark morning sky. The time was 9 A.M. The raid, the first of three conducted that day by the Red Air Force, marked the first time that Finns, no less than anyone in that part of the world, had seen a hostile aircraft at least since the Finnish Civil War twenty years before, let alone an entire squadron of bombing planes (as they were then quaintly called) flying in unison. It was also the first inkling to Helsinkians that Finland was actually, irrevocably at war with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, something that- despite the rapidly increasing tensions between the two countries over the past few days, including an obviously trumped-up border incident by the Soviets four days before-many of those like Ilmoni who were caught out by the surprise attack could not take in.

Ilmoni, who was on his way to class that morning, happened to be walking past the home of Juho Kusti Paasikivi, the Finnish minister to Sweden, former prime minister, and future president when he spotted the first Red bomber flying parallel to the street. Seven weeks before, on October 7, the twenty-one-year-old university student had been amongst the large throng of anxious Helsinkians who had accompanied Paasikivi and his fellow negotiators, Colonel Aladar Paasonen and Minister Counsellor Johan Nykopp, to the main Helsinki railway station, as they prepared to board the night train to Moscow, where Joseph Stalin and Vyacheslav Molotov had "invited" them in order to discuss "concrete political questions."

To prove to the Russians that they weren't in the mood to do what the Soviets wanted, the stubborn Finns had decided to take the slow, fifteen-hour train to Moscow rather than fly, as their cowed counterparts from the other independent Baltic nations of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania had recently done in response to their respective summonses from the Kremlin. Nineteen years before, Paasikivi had participated in the negotiations with the three-year-old Soviet Russian entity, then weary and impoverished after six cotinuous years of war and revolution, at the historic southern Estonian city of Tartu. The subsequent treaty--one of two the Bolsheviks grudgingly signed there, one with the triumphant Finns, the other with the no less ebullient Estonians, who had just won their own hard-fought war of independence from Moscow confirmed the new 1,600-kilometer- long Soviet-Fenno border, which, as the hinns insisted, mirrored the one they had shared with Russia during bygone Grand Duchy days.

Additionally, in line with Helsinki's wishes, the treaty they signed, known as the Peace of Tartu, granted Suomi the valuable, ice-free Arctic port of Persamo in exchange for a slice of the Karelian Isthmus, the 150-by-100-kilometer neck of land joining southeastern Finland with northwestern Russia, just as the benevolent Tsar Alexander Il had promised his Finnish subjects back in 1860. The steamer carrying Paasikivi and the other exultant Finnish delegates back to Helsinki following that successtul conclave, which effectively sealed Finland's century-long quest for independence from Russia, returned to resounding dockside cheers.

That was in 1920. Now, nearly two decades later, the ruddy-faced, sixty-nine-year-old Paasikivi, summoned back from what he had assumed would be his last posting in Stockholm, little thinking that he still had an entire political career ahead of him prepared to leave to meet with Joseph Stalin, now the all powerful head of a resurgent Soviet Union intent on reestablishing Russian influence in the Baltic basin. Now, in the second month of what would

Winter War/3

ultimately erupt into the five-year cataclysm known as the Second World War, it was, once again, the turn of the Communist heirs of Peter the Great and Alexander I to redraw the Baltic map in their favor. Now, as Paasikivi and his anxious four million countrymen knew, as he and his colleagues solemnly boarded the train for Moscow, they held nothing less than the fate of the Finnish nation in their hands. And yet, anxious though they were, the Finns who flocked to the great train station were not of a mood to appease the Kremlin. Then, as the fateful train pulled out and the avuncular Paasikivi doffed his homburg in farewell, the crowd spontaneously began to sing Luther's hymn, "A Mighty Fortress Is Our God."

As Max Jakobson, who witnessed the scene as a sixteen-year-old youth, would later write, the serenaders who came to see Paasikivi off, as well as those who met his train down the line as it chugged across Karelia, "showed an astonishing, almost unnatural lack of alarm, as if through an undirected, spontaneous, almost organic effort of self-discipline, [they] were silently bracing themselves to face some force of nature.... They did not sing patriotic songs on behalf of a policy of appeasement." As Paasikivi told Stalin, "They won't sing for us if we tell them that we have given away Hanko," referring to the historic, strategically located Finnish fort-cum-spa situated on the southernmost tip of Finland that the Kremlin adamantly insisted on having back for itself?

Seven weeks of on-and-off negotiations--which had ultimately foundered over the pivotal issue of Hanko--were helped along by a fabricated incident at the border town of Mainila. There, the Russians, stealing a page from the Germans (who had used a similar pretext for their invasion of Poland), arranged for several of their own soldiers to be killed by what they insisted was Finnish artillery fire. Christian Ilmoni thought he saw Paasikivi look out the windows. his house, as the covey of bombers flew by. "I wonder what the Old Man must be thinking now?" he wondered, as he recounted that traumatic day, still crystal clear in retrospect, seventy years later. At first, the unusually low altitude of the Soviet planes, which had flown undetected across the Gulf of Finland from one of the Soviets' new, forcibly acquired Estonian air bases, caused some unsuspecting pedestrians to mistake foe for friend. "The planes were flying absurdly low, less than a thousand feet; Ilmoni recounted. "Some of the people walking nearby actually thought they were our own." "Our own?!” he shouted. "Can't you see the Red star on the wing?”

Moments later came several massive explosions, followed by the sound of strafing, mixed with the slow pom-pom of the 40 mm Bofors anti-aircraft guns that had recently been placed at strategic points around the city, belatedly coming into action to meet the surprise attack. Now, instantly, Helsinkians knew the terrible truth. Once again, as had occurred innumerable times over the centuries, through the Swedish-Novgorodian wars of the 1300s, 1400s, and 1500s, through the Lesser and Great Wraths of the eighteenth century, through the Finland War of 1808 by which Finland was severed from Sweden and became a Russian grand duchy, Suomi was under attack from the enemy from the East.

Once again, the city's ululating air raid sirens confirmed, the Russian "tyrant" had come--except that this time he had come from the air. Mai-Lis Toivenen née Paavola, a veteran member of Lotta Svard, the Finnish women's auxiliary based in her hometown of Koivisto at the head of Vipuri Bay, who served in the organization along with I30,000 Other Finnish women during the Winter War, also remembered that epochal morning. The seventeen-year-old Mai-Lis, like

Winter War/4

 

so many of her countrywomen, had joined the Lotta Svard in the upsurge of patriotism that swept the nation the previous summer, and had worked in a canteen during the autumn. Now she was attending her first class of the day in Viipuri (then Finland's second largest city, located a mere fifty kilometers from the border on the Karelian Isthmus) when the town's alarm began ringing, signaling the start of the Soviet attack. Unlike her Helsinki kinsmen, Mai-Lis had no difficulty identifying the Red bombers. She had already seen plenty of Stalin's "falcons" or "eagles" as they were also called over the past summer as they engaged in arrant--and unchallenged-overflights of Finnish airspace. "I remember seeing how the Russian planes were flying so arrogantly over our skies. They flew so low one could see the faces of the pilots and the Red stars on their wings. It was very odd. Nevertheless we carried on with our lives as best we could." War tensions and Soviet bombers aside, Mai-Lis remembers the summer of 1939, the summer avant le deluge was a good one. "It was very hot that summer," said Toivenen. "I remember swimming a lot." The following day, as war clouds continued to gather over northern Europe and the mobilization continued, Mai-Lis donned the curiously sexless smock of the Lotta Svard and returned to her canteen work at the Koivisto Civil Guards house. Still, despite the proximity of war, including those "arrogant" Red fighters, the attractive teenager, like so many Finns of her sheltered generation who had been fortunate enough to grow up during the peaceful and prosperous 1930s, couldn't quite believe that war would actually come.

Then came the morning of November 30, the clanging school alarm and those droning Red airplanes. Moreover, these Red intruders were dropping bombs. Moments later, as Vipuri was enshrouded in geysers of smoke and debris thrown up by the Russian bombs, her frightened teacher led Mai-Lis and her schoolmates to a stone house across the street for protection.

Twenty-four kilometers and a windswept world away, in the middle of the Gulf of Finland, Mai-Lis's fellow auxiliary worker, Anna-Lisa Veijalainen, a member of the Society for the Care of Coastal Soldiers (RSHY), a women's organization which provided food and entertainment for the thousands of Finnish troops manning the dozens of fortresses along Finland's southern coast, was asleep in the upstairs room of the canteen hall of Tuppura, a small fortified island at the mouth of the Viipuri archipelago, on the morning of the Russian invasion. A year before, Anna-Lisa, then a twenty-one-year-old "domestic science" (as home economics was then called) student in Viipuri, had bravely if somewhat reluctantly accepted an invitation from the SCCS-whose 5,000 volunteer workers labored in the shadows of the far better known lottas- to be hostess of Tuppura canteen. Evidently the prior holder of the post, a flighty type, had fled in a panic after the Czechoslovak crisis of 1938 prompted the increasingly nervous Helsinki government to augment its garrisons on many of its island outposts.

Although the job took some getting used to, Anna-Lisa found that she enjoyed her duties, which entailed making large quantities of coffee and doughnuts for the soldiers and coastguardsmen assigned to Tuppura, as well as otherwise making them comfortable. "Work at the canteen started to feel meaningful," she wrote in her moving 2007 memoir, A Woman at the Front: 1938-45. "We tried as best as we could to create some coziness for the boys, who at that time rarely got leaves, so the war nest' was the only place they could spend their free time."

 

Winter War/5

 

Anna-Lisa also grew fond of the relatively large "war nest" itself, a converted officer's club, which featured a spacious kitchen, parquet floors, a recreation room with a working gramophone and a relatively au courant pile of records, a quiet room where "her boys" could write letters home before flopping on the couch, and floor-to-ceiling windows that looked out on the restive green-blue sea. She also fell in love with Tuppura itself, with its yellow expanse of stonecrop and chives pushing up from every crack, and wild pansies. "And no place," she adds, "had bigger lilies of the valley than that island. We carried huge bouquets of them and pansies to the tables of our canteen for the boys to admire."

The main island was connected to Kuningassaari-King Island-so called because Gustavus Ill, the absolutist (and ultimately assassinated) eighteenth century Swedish sovereign had once alighted there to survey his stormy domain. On the rocky tip of the islet there was a lighthouse that guided the large cruise ships that called on Viipuri, Finland's second largest port, as they navigated the treacherous reefs off the surrounding archipelago. To her delight, Anna-Liisa discovered that the adjoining islet also housed a small, elm-enclosed tennis court where she could relax in solitude for a while before crossing the little white bridge that connected Kuningasaari with the main island to return to the cozy canteen and her appreciative charges.

Like her junior land-based colleague Mai-Lis, Anna-Lisa remembers the summer of 1939 as hot and hectic. By this time she had been serving doughnuts and coffee to the men of Tuppura for nearly a year, while Finland prepared for a possible war with its increasingly bellicose neighbor. All was relatively quiet until the morning of November 30, when the storm cloud of Red fighters arrived at Tuppura. It was, she later recalled, her co-worker Hertta Turunen's turn to go downstairs to heat the stove and boil the coffee for "the boys" that morning.  She barely had time to get downstairs before the kitchen telephone rang," Anna-Lisa wrote, "when simultaneously several airplanes roared above the fortress almost at rooftop altitude." Even under the hair-raising circumstances, however, her co-worker was careful of her manners: "As a girl of good upbringing Hertta took the time to knock on the door before shouting in shock: “’The aide-de-camp called, we are at war!’” and Major von Behr [the commander of Tuppura] ordered us to get to the pier in less than an hour and to leave the island."

Quickly throwing on her clothes, the formidable auxiliary worker promptly called the major back. "I explained to [him] that I simply could not depart in an hour without leaving the entire stock of canteen possessions unguarded. I was responsible for them!" Shortly afterward, after throwing the canteen cashbox into a suitcase and otherwise doing her best to secure the premises as the furious officer stormed down the pier, Anna-Lisa and her two co-workers were physically shoved into a small tugboat for the ride back to Uraa, the largest of the islands in Viipuri Bay, where the Finns had greater forces and the women would presumably be better protected. Just in case, the self-serious major had told the skipper to make evasive maneuvers if and when the Russian planes returned, "although we found it difficult to see how a small tugboat could manage to evade airplanes on the open sea." Somehow they did." Eva Kilpi, the noted Finnish writer, was then eleven years of age and living with her family in the hamlet of Hitola, 200 kilometers north of Viipuri in Karelia. "Our house was on the shore of a small lake," she recalled, "and if I close my eyes I can imagine it is still summer. In Karelia it was

 

Winter War/6

 

always warm and sunny, it seems." Like many of her fellow Karelian schoolchildren, Kilpi had heard about the possibility of war and worried about it. "I used to pray to God to prevent the war. And I remember that I carried the fear of the war inside my child's heart. We didn't quite believe it would come, that it would come to Hiitola."

"But then, when we were eating lunch [that day], suddenly we saw planes coming straight toward our house and father shouted that we should go immediately back to the cellar. And then the bombs started dropping."

Martha Gellhorn, the famed American war correspondent, had just arrived in Helsinki the previous day to report on the growing tension between Finland and Russia, little suspecting that those tensions were about to explode into full-fledged war. Gellhorn was getting ready for breakfast in her room on the second floor of the venerable Hotel Kamp, where the foreign press was headquartered, when she heard the first bombs.

The glamorous thirty-six-year-old journalist had already gained international repute for her dispatches for Collier's from the Spanish Civil War, where she had met her current paramour, the novelist Ernest Hemingway, with whom she was then living in Cuba. In November, with Germany and Russia's joint annexation of Poland a fait accompli, Gellhorn, desirous of reestablishing her journalistic bona fides, wired her editor, Charles Colebaugh, in New York for a frontline assignment.

To the idealistic Bryn Mawr graduate, whose vivid dispatches about the American depression for the Federal Relief Emergency Administration had brought her to the attention of First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt, the stakes were even higher than they had been in Spain, now that as a result of the Nazi-Soviet nonaggression pact the world's two greatest totalitarian states were on the same antidemocratic side. "This was the war to save our skins," Gellhorn wrote. "Now one could only ally one's mind and heart with the innocents-the various unknown peoples who would be paying for [it] with all they had to love and lose."

But where were these new innocents? Poland, divvied up between the Germans and the Russians after its valiant but futile five-week fight, was lost. The Western front was tense but quiet, as the French Army hunkered down in comfort behind the purportedly impregnable Maginot Line. Except for the war at sea, which was beginning to heat up, culminating in the dramatic Battle of the River Plate the only story that would, briefly, take the world's attention away from the Soviet Fenno confrontation that winter-and the occasional aerial skirmish between the Royal Air Force and the Luftwaffe over the English Channel, there was no war. There didn't seem to be a war, just a Phony War, as people called it.

Colebaugh advised Gellhorn to go to Finland. "He thought something might happen there." Like most Americans, Gellhorn knew as little about Finland as she did about Poland. She didn't even know where Finland was until she looked it up on a map. Apparently, she hadn't even heard of Paavo Nurmi, the Finnish track runner and multiple Olympics hero of the 1920s, then

 

Winter War/7

 

the most famous Finn in the world except perhaps for Jean Sibelius, the great composer. Gellhorn did some more research. She liked what she found. In addition to being hardworking and fiscally responsible and fleet on their feet (and skis), the Finns, she read, were highly literate and talented beyond their numbers, "a good democracy" -a democracy worth saving.  

And so on November 10, armed with her Underwood typewriter and a signed letter of introduction from Eleanor Roosevelt, Gellhorn boarded a Belgium- bound Dutch freighter. Pausing a few days in still-neutral Belgium, Gellhorn crossed the North Sea again, this time by plane, bound for Stockholm, where she stopped for a day before finally flying on to Helsinki, arriving on the afternoon of November 29.

It was not yet three o'clock when Gellhorn's cab rumbled to a stop in front of the venerable seventy-year-old hotel, a legacy from Finland's Grand Duchy days. As Helsinki is wont at that time of year, the capital was already cold and dark. There was no time to take a tour of the city or get an update from her fellow correspondents, a motley crew of Americans, Britons, and sundry Scandinavians who had been covering the off-again, on-again Soviet-Fenno negotiations for the past month, and who, she could see, were massed downstairs desultorily going through the day's press communiqués. The storied old hotel, a long-time center of Finnish society and a watering hole for the Finnish intelligentsia at its palm-bedecked café had been requisitioned by the government for use as a press center. On the night of November 29, perhaps a dozen or so correspondents were in residence there, reduced to filing "local color" features about Finnish dress and cuisine.

Exhausted from her 4,000-mile journey, Gellhorn trooped up the stately old hotel's well-worn carpeted steps to her blacked-out room. Minutes later she was asleep. Then came the bombs. "I’ll be damned," Gellhorn muttered, as she ran to her window overlooking Esplanadi. Colebaugh, it turned out, had been right."

"I saw a huge trimotor [sic] bomber go over at about 1,000 meters," she wrote Hemingway several days later. "Low and slow, just wandering around." But this plane was not dropping bombs but thousands of paper leaflets, which fell on the pavement or caught in the trees of the adjoining pocket park. As the reporter continued to peer outside, dozens of well-dressed Helsinkians, most of whom had been caught by surprise, began making their way to the vaestosuoja, the crude, timber-lined air raid shelters which had been constructed in the center of the park. Several stooped to pick up the Soviet leaflets." One read: "SOLDIERS! PUT DOWN YOUR ARMS RETURN HOME AND PROTECT YOURSELF! PREVENT STARVATION! WE HAVE BREAD!" And another: "Finnish Comrades! We come to you not as conquerors, but as liberators of the Finnish people from the oppression of capitalists and landlords. We must not shoot each other. At the behest of the imperialists Cajander [Aimo Cajander, the Finnish prime minister], Mannerheim, etc. have broken off negotiations and transformed Finland into an armed camp, subjecting the Finnish people to terrible suffering."

Those Helsinkians who bothered to read the leaflets were stupefied. The undernourished, downtrodden nation referred to in the crudely written Soviet pamphlets had no relation to the

 

Winter War/8

 

comfortable, well-fed country that they knew. Indeed, the crude agit-prop falling from the skies would have been laughable, if it weren't for those deadly serious bombs exploding nearby.

"Molotov's breadbaskets," an unknown wag had dubbed the explosives. The name stuck.

 

                                                                        ****

 

WHILE the astonished newspaperwoman was observing the surreal scene outside her window at the Kamp, Herbert Berridge Elliston, the British-born correspondent for the Boston-based Christian Science Monitor ran to his. The previous day, the forty-four-year-old Elliston, a veteran of the First World War who had fought in the Royal Horse Artillery, had trooped up to his room, just across from Gellhorn's, after investigating the contrived frontier incident at Mainila. "I scrambled from bed and looked out," Elliston wrote,? "It was a perfect winter morning, with the sun coming out of a blue sky, unflecked save for one cotton wooly ball cloud. Inside that cloud were Russian planes. Through the trailing steamer of the cloud, a couple of planes could be seen in nebulous outline. With its destructive freight, the solitary cloud moved across the heavens like a Spanish galleon in full sail."

After the two-month lull in the West following the fall of Poland, something was finally happening, and Elliston and his excited fellow reporters were right there for the action. "You got the illusion, indeed," Elliston gushed, "that the clouds must have borne the machines all the way across the Gulf of Finland. Presently the cloud arrived overhead a little to my right. All this time noise continued without cease-the dull detonation of exploding bombs breaking through a continual screech of air raid alarms and the rat-tat-tat of machine guns, "

At least the newsman was under no illusions about the objective of the raid. "This was a Blitzkrieg designed to overcome and conquer the Finns from the air. I watched intently," Elliston continued, "because victory or defeat in this type of diplomacy-war [sic] depends upon the behavior of the people." Evidently, the raid was not having its intended effect. "There was no panic. The people in the park below stayed at the entrance of the bomb shelters and gazed skyward at the Soviet apparition."

In the Kamp press room, Elliston began making calls, trying to find more about the surprise Soviet attack. His first impulse was to ring Risto Ryti, the long-time chairman of the Bank of Finland. Ellison had already met Ryti two years before, during a prewar fact-finding mission to northern Europe in his capacity as financial editor and columnist for the Monitor. He had been told beforehand that the central banker - who ran unsuccessfully for president that year against the grandfatherly Kyosti Kallio - was one of the best-informed men in Europe.

Not that Ryti was of much help. When the reporter reached "Finland's Alexander Hamilton," as he admiringly described him, he was just as stumped as anyone by the Soviet attack. The

Winter War/9

 

perplexed financier told his journalistic acquaintance that he had heard a rumor that Norway had been given an ultima- tum by Moscow to hand over the Arctic port of Narvik.? Had he heard anything about this?  Ryti asked the equally puzzled reporter, as bombs crashed and sirens wailed in the background. Well, if he did, asked the polite Ryti who, unbeknownst to him, would be appointed prime minister the following day to steer Finland through the crisis- would Elliston be so kind as to give him a ring?

"Of course," Elliston said, putting down the phone and shaking his head. "Storm over Europe!" he thought to himself. "What on earth had Stalin started in [this] part of the world? It was the beginning of a wild day."

 

                                                                        ****

 

FOR his part, fifteen-year-old Harry Matso was too busy shepherding his school- mates to safety to be afraid. He, too, had been singing his morning prayers - Jewish prayers - when the first Russian raiders dropped their mixed payload of incendiary bombs and propaganda.

As it happened, the school was located 500 meters from Hietaniemi, Helsinki's main cemetery, where the 200 pupils were quickly evacuated under the supervision of a gymnastics teacher. "Harry," the teacher told Matso, who was assisting him, after the orderly procession reached its destination, "pull all the children under the trees and behind the tombstones." The teacher, quite rightly, was concerned that the children's colorful clothing would make them easy tar gets for the strafing Soviet planes. Then, as a raider whizzed by a few hundred meters overhead, the teacher dove for cover himself as Matso followed.

When Matso carefully got to his feet, after the all-clear sounded a half-hour or so later, the youth saw that a house bordering the cemetery had been bombed to bits. A bereaved-looking man emerged, carrying the limp body of a young girl, apparently his daughter, one of the ninety-six Helsinkians who died on that horrific day.

Finnish prime minister Aimo K. Cajander, the same man whom several days before Pravda denounced as a small beast of prey without sharp teeth and strength but having a cunning lust"--actually a mild-mannered sixty-year-old botanist who had headed Finland's Forest and Park Service prior to assuming office in 1937--was preparing to chair an executive session of the Finnish cabinet in its large, mirror-lined room on the second floor of the main government building, when the first flight of Soviet bombers entered Finnish air space at nine o’clock? in fact, the flight had been timed to coincide with the meeting-_ one of the few things about the Soviet attack plan that went right.

The purpose of the emergency conclave was to discuss the meaning of the Kremlin's sudden

 

Winter War/10

 

and surprising decision to break off diplomatic relations the night before, which had been conveyed in a somewhat confusing note that the long-time Finnish minister to Moscow and former foreign minister Aarno Yrjo-Koskinen had abruptly been handed ten hours before. "The only aim of our nation is to safeguard the security of the Soviet Union," stated the baffling communiqué, signed by Molotov," and in particular Leningrad with its population of 3,500,000."

To be sure, the issue of Leningrad's vulnerability to the west--the concern that had originally prompted the Soviet "invitation" to discuss the issue with them--was not an unreasonable concern. After all, the Soviet Union's second-largest city was located very close to the border between the two nations-and the Finns had had very close relations with Kaiser Wilhelm, who had sent an expedition of troops to Helsinki that secured the German-backed Whites' victory against the Soviet-backed Reds during the civil war, and reasonably good ones with his eventual successor, Adolf Hitler. One could well understand that concern--which would be validated in June 1941 when the Germans used the "Karelian gateway" to invade northwestern Russia. What was confusing, at least to the Finns, was the next part of Molotov's note.

After accusing the Finnish government of bad faith, the blunt-talking apparatchik, who had replaced his more emollient predecessor, Maxim Litvinov, in May continued: "We can no longer tolerate the present situation, for which the Finnish government bears full responsibility. Our government has decided it can no longer maintain normal relations with Finland."

It certainly sounded like a declaration of war. On the other hand, Molotov seemed to leave some hope that the rapidly deteriorating situation between the two countries could still be resolved through negotiation, mysteriously stating that his country remained ready to meet Finland "more than halfway about territorial questions," including the Karelian peninsula, now half-divided between Finland and the USSR. He also thought he would even be ready to consider the question of "uniting the entire Karelian people and Karelia with their brotherly people, the Finns" (an outcome Molotov wound up ultimately achieving following the cession of Finnish Karelia, and the evacuation westward of virtually the entire population, though doubtless not in the way he envisioned). To further confuse matters, the démarche reiterated the Soviet's “utmost respect for Finland's sovereignty and independence.”

Did Moscow want war or not? It was hard to figure out. The cabinet debate went back and forth. Then came the explosions of the first Soviet bombs. Now the confusion was over. Now Cajander and his fellow politicians knew, as they rushed to the window and saw smoke billowing from the city center, that Finland was at war.

Actually, the cabinet was slightly behind the times. In point of fact, Finland and the Soviet Union had been in a state of belligerency since 6:50 that morning, when a goodly proportion of the nearly 2,000 field guns the Soviets had at the start of the war, which they managed to wheel up to the border without being detected by the laggard Finnish intelligence, unleashed a huge cannonade. The massive barrage, the largest such bombardment since the end of the First

 

Winter War/11

 

World War, was punctuated by the booming reports of the long-range guns of the naval fortress island at Kronstadt, thirty kilometers west of Leningrad, at the head of the Gulf of Finland.

Seconds later, the still snow-laden frontier became a roiling, roaring, white cauldron, as giant birch trees suddenly turned into twigs. Boulders went flying. The scattered farms and buildings within the fire zone, which had already been hastily evacuated by the government, disintegrated in a cloud of snow and dust. Unfortunately, neither Finnish intelligence, then overseen by an incompetent associate of Mannerheim's by the name of Colonel Lars Rafael Melander, nor the equally blind civil authorities, who were still not willing to believe that war would actually come, had done a very careful job of the evacuation, resulting in the capture of over 4,000 Finnish civilians.

Then, as green rockets fired up into the black sky, signaling the start of the assault, thousands of Soviet troops, many of them screaming and singing, plunged into the Rajajoki River (the river separating then Finnish Karelia and Russian Karelia, now called the Sestra) holding their weapons over their heads. They were followed by something that most Finns, or Finnish troops, had never seen before: tanks. Evidently the Kremlin meant business.

 

                                                                        ****

 

AS Harry Berner, then a corporal stationed in the medieval border town of Terijoki, recalled: "On November 28th, we had returned to the central barracks in Terijoki from a one-week reconnaissance of the area. Then the next morning we were awakened by this gigantic artillery barrage, through which we could hear the big guns at Kronstadt. None of us had ever experienced, or even imagined, anything like it."

Berner's unit, like most of the Finnish units that experienced the brunt of the Soviet attack, recovered from its shock soon enough and went into fighting retreat mode. "We were ordered out into the streets to delay the enemy as much as possible," he says. "I was posted by the general store. Then we saw Russian troops appear on the outskirts of town, as they poured out of the Rajajoki [River]. We exchanged fire. Those were our orders: fight, delay, retreat. Of course, we didn't have much choice."

The attack made for inspiring copy by Nikolai Virta, a well-known Soviet writer who had signed on with Pravda as a combat correspondent. Except in tone, Vita's breathless account essentially squares with Berner's:

“On the stroke of 8 A.M., the signal was flashed and from the south, the air was suddenly filled with the whistle of shells, the echo of their detonation, the deeper boom of howitzers, and the muffled roar of the heavies. From Kronstadt, one heard the distant echo of the great fortress

 

Winter War/12

 

guns. Thirty seconds later the horizon became a sheet of flame. The whole Finnish frontier was ablaze. Then began the rattle of machine guns, answered by those of the Finns. The cannonade continued for thirty minutes along the front of 140 kilometers, eighteen kilometers deep.”

“Then green rockets shot up, signaling the Red infantry to attack and the troops charged, cheering, toward the frontier. Plunging into the icy waters of [Rajajoki] river, they started work on pontoon bridges. At 9: 15 the section's first battalion crossed the frontier on bridges and entered Finnish territory. The forests, so silent an hour ago before the attack, suddenly filled with the roaring of the motors of tanks, the clank of caterpillar links, and the sirens of the machines along the snow-covered roads.”

Interestingly, Virta was sporting enough to give Berner and his fellow defenders credit: "The enemy resists with determination." The tone of his reportage would become more vituperative and less charitable toward the Finnish enemy as the Soviet advance bogged down, and would continue thus as scores of mines and booby traps that Finnish sappers had left behind in Terijoki began blowing up his comrades, but for the moment Virta was all gung-ho.

While Harry Berner and his colleagues were retreating before the onrushing Red hordes on the Rajajoki, 200 kilometers to the northeast, a mortarman by the name of Reino Oksanen was busy trying to stay warm. Like most of the men of his battalion, Oksanen hailed from the town of Messukyla near the southern central industrial city of Tampere. One of the strengths of the Finnish Army was that most of its men were drawn from the same area. "It was a good thing as we knew each other well when the fighting began. We knew each other's qualities.”

Oksanen completed his compulsory military training in 1935. It was then that he received instruction in the use of the light 81 mm mortar, one of nine such Weapons assigned to each company. Not that he expected to put that training to use anytime soon. After all, Finland and Russia were at peace or supposed to be. That all had changed in the fall of 1939, "Trouble had been brewing for a long time. But when they [the Army] started handing out calls for special training in October, we knew that this was serious. We were told to bring winter clothing. And guns. We were supposed to have submachine guns, but in reality, they were quite rare. I was given a standard Pystykorva rifle, as were we all."

Oksanen and his fellow soldiers from Messukyla were first assembled in a Tampere linen factory along with the rest of the 16th Regiment, which was nearby Lt. Aaro Pajari, who would later distinguish himself in the pivotal battle of Tolvajarvi. Oksanen slept side by side with his comrades on the floor of the factory. The next day, November 15, they were dispatched by train to the Luumak Taavetti area of Ladoga-Karelia, the area north of Finland's Lake Ladoga, where the entire division dug in.

Still, like the great majority of Finns, the men from Messukyla were skeptical that war would actually come: "Even then we debated amongst ourselves whether Finland would have to go to war." Still, the general mood was very defiant. "We took turns in bragging how we would annihilate the 'Russkies' or at least some of us did," Oksanen said. "There was this one man

 

Winter War/13

 

from Tampere who was full of enthusiasm when the negotiations were underway. He said he would be disappointed if peace endured. He was eager, he said, for Russky blood. Of course, when the fighting began in earnest he amounted to nothing."

 

                                                                        ****

 

MARSHAL Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim was having breakfast with his niece's husband, Bjorn Weckmann, at his mansion in Kaivopuisto, Helsinki's fashionable diplomatic district, when they were startled by the sound of bombs.

It was a sound, one suspects, that the venerable Finnish general, who at seventy-two retained the ramrod posture of the imperial chevalier he had once been, at once dreaded and welcomed. Dreaded because it signaled the start of a costly war which he knew, as chairman of Finland's defense council, a post he had repeatedly resigned in frustration, Finland was not properly prepared to fight and couldn't possibly win.

Once again, as it had twenty years before, the country of his birth needed him. First, in I9I8, following Finland's declaration of independence from Bolshevik Russia, the Finnish government had turned to Mannerheim, asking him to take command of the disparate White counterrevolutionary forces and quash the nascent Red rebellion that Lenin had engineered. Additionally, he had to disarm the Russian troops still stationed in Finland. Few generals have ever been handed a more difficult set of tasks. But Mannerheim, who had spent the greater part of his adult life in Russia and was a member of Finland's Swedish-speaking minority and hitherto a virtual unknown in his own country, succeeded in bringing the brutal civil war, which cost an estimated 37,000 lives and included atrocities on both sides, to an end, securing the republic's independence.

Following that, Mannerheim, who later that year left Finland out of disgust with its increasingly pro-German inclinations, was asked by the Finnish cabinet to turn around and help batten down Finnish sovereignty, by obtaining recognition from the skeptical Allies. Assenting, the versatile soldier diplomat proceeded to wow both London and Paris with his dashing looks and courtly manners, as well as his manifest love and passion for his native land. “From capital to capital he went, pleading the cause for Finland," wrote Herbert Elliston. "He not only won recognition for Finland; he won friends for her."

Befriending or even understanding the enigmatic former imperial officer was a different matter. No man could be curter, as Henry Bell, Great Britain's first consul to Helsinki, discovered when he came to call on Mannerheim one day at the London residence of the aloof former Russian general. Mannerheim had generally been genial to him, Bell wrote.

"One day, however," Bell continued, "Mannerheim was more brusque. He addressed me in

Winter War/14

 

Swedish instead of the usual English. He hardly acknowledged my formal greeting, and he would not listen to what I had come to say. Sitting behind his great table, with a map of Finland and another of Russia in front of him, he said severely, 'Herr Consul, do you bring me good news today?'

"I blushed and stammered: 'I regret, Your Excellency… "Herr Consul,' Mannerheim interjected, 'if you do not soon bring me the good news that Britain has recognized the independence of Finland, your visits will no longer be welcome. Good day."

 

                                                                        ****

 

IN THE EVENT, the inscrutable Mannerheim succeeded so well at his diplomatic mission that in December 1918, he was summoned back to Helsinki and named Regent. There was talk of making him king; certainly, he had the ingredients of one. However, like George Washington, a figure to whom he was frequently compared, Mannerheim refused.

Instead, he preferred to run for president. However, Mannerheim, still bearing the bloody stigma of the excesses of the White forces during the recent civil war, in which scores of Finnish Communists had been summarily executed (and for which he seems to have been at least indirectly responsible), lost to the more homely, down-to-earth Kaarlo Juho Stahlberg. For most Finns, the distant, haughty, outspokenly anti-Communist general was, in the final analysis, too charged, too complicated a figure for them to entrust the peacetime destiny of their fragile young republic.

And so "The Liberator," as he was now called, at the relatively young age of fifty-one, rode off into the Finnish sunset. The finicky Mannerheim now gladly turned away from the untidy maelstrom of Finnish politics and devoted himself to humanitarian pursuits, becoming a major supporter of the Finnish Red Cross and helping to found Finland's first child welfare organization. As Douglas MacArthur, the great American general who was in many ways Mannerheim's spiritual kinsman, once famously put it, “old generals never die, they just fade away."

Except that, like many early retired generals, Mannerheim wasn't very happy about just fading away. Photos of Mannerheim from the interwar period, during which he also served as chairman of the board of Commercial Bank of Helsinki, show him looking tense and distracted. At heart, he was still a soldier. These were Mannerheim’s wilderness years, Reputedly,  at one point during the late 1920s, the old soldier was so bored with civilian life that he inquired about joining the Foreign Legion.

In any event, if Mannerheim wished to fade away, he made sure that he did it within general

 

Winter War/15

 

viewing distance renting a large manor house in the Kaviopuisto diplomatic district (the same one that today houses the Mannerheim Museum), filling it with all manner of trophies and military mementos from his far-flung life, including the year he spent reconnoitering China on horseback for the Russian intelligence service, and quietly waiting to see if his services were needed again.

                                                                      

                                                                        ****

 

THEY were. In 1931, as a resurgent Russia began to flex its military muscles, the newly elected president, Pehr Evin Svinhufvud, asked Mannerheim to assume the chairmanship of Finland's Defense Council, an advisory board charged with overseeing the build-up of Finland's armed forces and border defenses. Particularly important was the part man-made, part natural Karelian defensive line running from the Gulf of Finland through Summa to the Vuoksi River and ending at Taipale, which separated Finland from the Soviet Union and which Mannerheim himself initiated in 1918. Perhaps inevitably, it eventually took his name even though he himself had very little to do with the ultimate design of the line itself.

More recently, as the crisis with Russia reached a head, he also oversaw the partial mobilization of Finland's armed forces. This was Mannerheim's least happy posting. Angered at the refusal of the government, which had continued to remain complacent about the Soviet armed threat, to allocate adequate monies for defense, including for the as-yet incomplete Karelian defensive line, he resigned the position several times, including, most recently, in June 1939. Informed of the negotiations between the government and Moscow before the talks broke down, Mannerheim had urged the cabinet to try to find some way of satisfying the Kremlin without forcing a fight. "We must absolutely come to an agreement," he urged.

"Mannerheim knew how to be afraid," as Finnish historian Veijo Meri put it, "a good quality in a soldier." Also, to a surprising degree for a man who was on record as refusing to shake the hand of a Communist, he understood and even empathized with the Kremlin's legitimate strategic concerns, however clumsily expressed, about protecting the approaches to Leningrad in a future conflict.

"The White General, whom Communist propagandists liked to call the butcher of the working class; was probably the last person the Russians expected to see their point of view," Max Jakobson notes. "Yet Mannerheim stood then as later for moderation and flexibility in foreign policy, and as a former tsarist officer could appreciate the problems of Russia's defense planners."

After all, as Stalin had pointed out in the Moscow talks, the British had used Koivisto as an anchorage to launch a successful motorboat raid on the Soviet base at Kronstadt in 1919 as part

 

Winter War/16

 

of their "unofficial" but decisive aid to newly independent Estonia, then battling its own Red insurgency (as Finland had also successfully done, with German help, the year before). The Russians had sound reason to be fearful, too. As Stalin told the skeptical Finnish delegates who questioned his concern about another Great Power using Finnish territory to attack Russia at some future date, "Everything can change in this world" (true indeed, as Stalin would again learn in June 1941, when his putative Nazi ally turned against the USSR).

During the months leading up to the Moscow talks, Mannerheim continued to advise the Cajander government to cede the Russians as much as possible without destroying the country's power to put up a good defensive fight, proposing that it grant the Soviets several of the larger islands in the Gulf of Finland, as well as moving the Soviet-Fenno border westward and giving up some territory in Karelia. When the cabinet told him that it could not survive the public outcry that would follow even a suggestion of such sacrifices, Mannerheim went further, proposing to risk his own prestige and vouch for the necessity of such concessions. (The government did not take him up on the offer.) Moreover, he said, "The army cannot fight."

Of course, this was an exaggeration. What Mannerheim meant, of course, was that the Finns did not have enough to fight with, which was perfectly true. By the fall of 1939, after strenuous rearmament that he had instigated, the Finnish Army could place 265,000 men in the field, an extraordinary number for a nation of only 3.7 million. But What sort of equipment did they have with which to fight? The army possessed a total of ten battle-ready ancient Vickers-type tanks (half of which would be destroyed in a catastrophic engagement in February 1940). Some of the army's rifles dated to the 1890s. The then much-vaunted Mannerheim Line, often and wrongly compared to France's far more complex, far more sophisticated Maginot Line, in fact had only two "showcase bunkers," the so-called Poppius and Million Dollar bunkers that were anything like the Maginot's interconnected bastions; the other 10-odd strongpoints were fairly rudimentary.

Moreover, as historian Carl Frederik-Guest points out, unlike the Maginot, the Mannerheim Line was meant to delay an invader, not repel him, although it did a pretty fair job of the latter when the test ultimately came. The Soviet writer and war correspondent Leonid Sobolev, who later accompanied the Russian marines who ultimately overcame those three forts and their less heavily armored interlocking defenses, was certainly impressed:

“This powerful position of two armored bunkers, or, more accurately, forts, was built over several years. The art and skill of the best European engineers were invested into this ensemble of fortifications, which even the First-class European defense sector would envy. All forts, bunkers, trenches and snipers' nests protect each other. Then the best trained Finnish Home Guards were brought here, they were shown this concrete and steel, anti-tank rocks, underground galleries and mines, camouflaged anti-tank gun positions, sniper nests in trees, ten rows of barbed wire and full ammunition storage.”

“One could, indeed, hold out here as long as one had to. The splinters of our heaviest shells, which exploded next to the bunker, did no harm. Even a direct hit from a heavy round could

 

Winter War/17

 

only shake this monstrous shell; bite off a chunk of concrete, but not more. A direct hit from artillery at long range is a matter of pure luck, one chance in a thousand.”

Of course, the army would still fight. And so would Mannerheim. Although there was no explicit agreement about this, it came to be understood that, if worse came to worst and war broke out, Mannerheim himself would become commander-in-chief. Now, on that fateful morning of awakening, as Russian bombers darkened the skies over Helsinki, Mannerheim knew that his moment had come. Now, once again, his country needed him, and that was all that mattered. In the end, he wasn't so complicated after all. Mannerheim was going to do what he was born and bred to do, and the opportunity reinvigorated him.

Inside Mannerheim's trophy-festooned manse was a painting by his old friend and comrade-in-arms Akseli Gallen-Kallela, showing a group of imaginary Finnish ski soldiers swathed in white, apparently advancing through a forest clearing to strike at the historic Russian foe. The artist had executed it forty years before, in 1899, to protest Tsar Nicholas Il's notorious ukase suspending Finnish autonomy. Gallen-Kallela, who died in 1931, evidently had considered the painting too provocative to display publicly and had kept it as part of his private collection. After the civil war, in which the passionate nationalist served as Mannerheim's aide-de-camp, the artist, also known as "Finland's painter," had given his old commander the painting as a gift Mannerheim had hung the canvas on a prominent place of the wall of his study. Did he steal a look at it on this day, November 30, 1939, as that martial fantasy was about to become a reality and he suited up for his new command? Or perhaps he thought about Gallen-Kallela's son Jorma, then serving as an officer on the front line in Karelia, on whom he also doted.

 

                                                                        ****

 

AS smoke from the first Russian bombs rose in the distance, Mannerheim, in full regalia, strode to the Ministry of Defense on Korkeavuorenkatu, just a few minutes away from his Kaivo home. This was a different Mannerheim from the careworn elder of weeks before. Gone were the depression and weariness of old age. "I hereby give notice that I am assuming the post of commander-in-chief of which so much has been said," Mannerheim peremptorily declared.

The minister, Niukkanen, informed his top commander about the situation, The situation was not good. The Soviets, who evidently had been building up their forces for weeks, had invaded Finland at nine points along the winding, 1,600-klometer border separating the two countries, including a main thrust across the isthmus. Niukkanen estimated the invading force would be at least two million men, backed up by at least five thousand pieces of heavy artillery and several hundred parks, plus a thousand planes (Niukkanen's figures were somewhat off, the initial striking force comprised 400,000 men, 2,000 tanks, 2,000 field guns; and 2,000 planes, all of which would be doubled or more by the end of the war). In addition to Helsinki, the

 

Winter War/18

 

minister reported, numerous other Finnish towns and cities, including Vipuri and Lahti, were reporting air raids. There was more. The Soviet navy had also been in action, attacking several islands and coastal fortresses with heavy gunfire. If Mannerheim was daunted by the magnitude of the attack, or by the leviathan task that now awaited him, he did not show it. Taking his leave of Niukkanen, Mannerheim next visited the office of President Kallio, where he withdrew his most recent resignation and formally assumed the post of commander-in-chief, before returning to his house.

Word of Mannerheim's reappointment quickly spread. For most Finns, that was all they needed to know. That night, as the skyline of Helsinki was wreathed in flames, Herbert Ellison, the American writer, took note of the electric effect of Mannerheim's return on the populace: "As I walked among the ruins of Helsinki's bombed streets, I saw bill posters [of Mannerheim's appointment] being put up," he wrote. "I can vouch for the fact that no proclamation ever geared a nation into fighting mood more successfully than the proclamation making Mannerheim commander-in-chief.

"The second raid, a shorter but more lethal one involving even more bombers, began at 2:55 P.M., just as Helsinki was beginning to recover from the first one. This time, however, the Soviet planes only carried bombs and incendiaries. Once again, as during the first raid, which evidently had been aimed at Malmi Airport, the city's recently inaugurated international airport, the raiders aim was abysmal. Targeting the main railroad station, whence Paasikivi had embarked on his successive, frustrating sorties, the bombers instead battered the large square in front of it, including a commuter bus that had just taken on its passengers, instantly incinerating it; a photo of the bus with the mangled remains of several Finnish civilians, one of the indelible images of the terror attack, splayed across the front pages of the world's press the next day."

Several fire bombs were also dropped on Helsinki’s prestigious Technical University on Bulevardi, one of the capital's most elegant avenues, all but obliterating it and killing a number of staff and students; the Russians also managed to freak most of the windows of the large, nearby Soviet legation io the consider able satisfaction of the population. After unleashing their bombs, the planes from the second raid swooped down to machine gun targets of opportunity, mostly fleeing civilians, wounding or killing dozens more before returning to their bases in Estonia, while further eastward, their fellow Soviet airmen returned to their bases in Leningrad after wreaking havoc on Vijpuri. The Soviet planes were at brazen, treetop level, recalled Olavi Eronen, then a message runner from Vipuri stationed with his regiment at Kuolemajarvi, a small village located on the western side of the Mannerheim Line.

Like many if not most of his fellow soldiers, Eronen was taken completely by surprise by the outbreak of hostilities. "We did not believe a war would come," he later recalled. "We had this non - aggression pact with the Russians, so people stayed in their homes until the last moment. The night before I was at home and went to the sauna. At seven in the morning I left for my regiment. When I walked down the steps, my father opened the window and shouted that the war had started. The station master at Terijoki had called and said the big guns at Kronstadt

 

Winter War/19

 

had opened up." As the cannonade continued, Eronen hastened to the small town of Seivasto, near the fire zone, to evacuate the stunned residents. Looking up, he saw a fleet of Soviet bombers bound for Viipuri and other points west. "The sky was full of planes." Several hours later, the raiders came back, but at much lower altitude. "For some reason, they had been told to fly really low, just above the treeline.  Apparently they had a doctrine that this was the safest way to return. Anyway, as I was escorting the villagers, I turned around after I heard a strange noise and realized that one of the Red planes was flying directly towards me. He was so low. I felt that I could almost touch him with my hand.”

"I fired several shots at it with my rifle, but apparently I did not hit anything vital," noted Eronen. Soon he thought better of such foolishness. "Only later did it occur to me that those planes had many gunners on them and that I was an easy target standing in the open." For its part, the Soviet Air Force, which would lose numerous bombers to ground fire during the successive raids of the next three days as Finnish anti-aircraft crews sprang into action, would later revise its policy. "Later in the war they did not fly so low," Eronen wryly observed.

 

                                                                        ****

 

MARTHA Gellhorn was having a hasty, belated repast at the Kamp when the second Russian raid began. "I never felt such explosions. The whole place rocked. Must have been like March in Barcelona," she wrote to Hemingway, referring to the Fascist Italian forces' attack on the republican Catalonian capital and its our skirts in March 1938; the two had developed a shorthand based on their experiences in Spain, "I went out and there was a huge curtain of smoke rolling down the street and people screamed ‘Gas!’ That was pretty awful, I may tell you.”

"Fortunately, it was a false alarm, one of the many noxious rumors that wafted about the shell shocked capital during those fist terror-filled days.  Another rumor which also proved false or exaggerated was that the Russians were going to drop parachute poops on the capital. In fact, the Russians, who were probably the most advanced country in terms of paratroop tactics in the world and had made parachuting something of a national sport, did drop small groups of reconnaissance troops, including a number of Finnish-speaking spies, in several parts of the country, including the Karelian Isthmus and the Petsamo region in the far north, to disastrous effect: the vast majority were captured and shot on the spot, or picked off while still airborne. If they did manage to land safely, the paratroopers had difficulty assembling in the thick Finnish trees. Nevertheless, the very use of these troops--the first time this novel form of warfare was employed on a modern battlefield--was sufficient to send a wave of terror that reached Helsinki,?

But no, there was no gas. And no parachutists--at least as yet. Relieved, the intrepid American

 

Winter War/20

 

reporter plunged outside, following the smoke, soon coming across "colossal fires, four apartment houses- just plain people's homes-burning like tissue paper. One house, by a gas station," Gellhorn continued, "had a vast hole blown in its side and a man shapeless and dead the way our little man on the corner of Florida [was]," invoking her and Hemingway's shared memories of the Fascist bombing of Barcelona three years before.

Accompanying Gellhorn were two Italian journalists who had also just arrived in the Finnish capital in time to see the first Soviet bombs fall. Enraged by the memory of the Spanish war, which Francisco Franco, the rebel leader and current (and future) dictator had won with the aid of his fellow German and Italian advisors against their Republican foes and Soviet advisors, the American spitfire couldn't resist the opportunity to goad the Italians. "Now you see what it's like to be on the other side, gentlemen, don't you?" she asked. Later, Gellhorn would be surprised to find that those same Italian Fascist journalists she lambasted that afternoon were actually along with their enraged leader, Benito Mussolini on the right side, the Finnish side, the democratic side this time, at least for the moment.

In the event, Il Duce had little sympathy or understanding for the non-aggression pact his ally, Nazi Germany, had signed with the Soviet Union. To him, as well as to many of his Fascist subjects, the Russian invasion of Finland was simply Communist aggression, and he had no qualms about saying so, even writing Adolf Hitler a pointed note to this effect. Over the next few days, Rome, like many world capitals, was the scene of violent anti-Soviet protests as well as effusive demonstrations of sympathy for Finland. Hundreds of enraged Italians deluged the Finnish embassy offering to take up arms for Helsinki." Indeed, Mussolini, for his part, was so put out about the Russian action that Hitler dispatched his foreign minister, Joachim Ribbentrop, to Rome to get him to calm down and not say or do anything that might offend the Kremlin.

Not that Hitler was particularly happy with the Russian invasion himself. Although the pact he had signed with Stalin had theoretically given the Kremlin a free hand to operate in the Baltic, he had at least expected to be warned of such a drastic move. He had not. Moreover, Hitler, like many Germans, felt a natural bond with and sympathy for Finland, with which Germany had long enjoyed a special political and cultural relationship dating back to the nineteenth century. When Finnish high school students studied a second language--or, rather, a third one, after Swedish, the language of their prior mother country--it was German. It was an expedition of German troops in 1918, during the civil war, which had helped decide the matter in favor of the Whites, under Mannerheim's command, thus securing Finnish independence.

In many ways, Finland, which had suppressed its own abortive Fascist putsch in 1932, but still had many officers or former officers of a right-wing bent-including one, Kurt Wallenius, who would rise to fame during the Winter War--was a natural partner for the Third Reich (as it would become during the ensuing Continuation War, when the two countries were co-belligerents). The Finnish and German armed forces, including the Finnish and German intelligence services, also enjoyed extensive cooperation during the 1930s. However, for the moment, Hitler needed the Russians more than he needed the Finns, as much as he admired

 

Winter War/21

 

them and their commander-in-chief, so the Fuhrer, who was capable of compromise (at least at that stage of the war), said nothing (at least publicly), and told his unhappy Italian ally to do the same. Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi propaganda chief, also hewed to the party line, publicly reprimanding the Finns for their obstinacy and ties with Nazi Germany's principal declared enemy, England, although for several days he allowed the first upbeat Finnish military communiqués to run side by side with the equally roseate (and misleading) Soviet ones, before he reluctantly suppressed them. No, those Italian journalists who were the butt of Martha Gellhorn's barbed remarks were actually on Finland's side, too. The unexpected Russo-Fenno conflict, which most observers assumed would be a quick walkover, blurred a lot of ideological lines--at least at first. Indeed, it would take some days before Gellhorn and a lot of other people could comprehend the surprise Russian attack and all of its political implications. All she knew for the moment was that she had unwittingly stumbled onto the biggest story in the world, and she went with it, turning in some of the finest prose of her career. "War started at nine o'clock promptly," began "Bombs from a Low Sky," her first lengthy dispatch from Helsinki for Collier’s:

“The people of Helsinki stood in the streets and listened to the painful rising and falling and always louder wail of the siren. For the first time in history. They heard the sound of bombs falling on their city. This is the modern way of declaring war. The people moved unhurriedly to bomb shelters or took cover in doorways and waited. That morning Helsinki was a frozen city inhabited by sleepwalkers. The war had come too fast and all the faces and all the eyes looked stunned and unbelieving... There were five great explosions and afterward the stillness itself was dreadful. Then a rumor flew through the quiet, broken streets: poison gas. Anything was believed now. We shuffled through broken glass in the streets. The gray afternoon was darker with smoke.”

“The bombed houses on this block were so shrouded in flames that you could not see through into the ruins. Turning left, we ran toward the light of another fire. The Technical School, a vast granite square of buildings, had been hit. The houses around it and on the next street were gutted clean, with flames leaping out of all the empty windows. Firemen worked fast and silently but there was nothing much to do except try to put out the fire. Later they could dig for the bodies, Clearly, despite the weeks of preparations and drills, the city authorities--who until recently had been more concerned with the preparations for the eagerly anticipated 1940 Helsinki Summer Olympic Games and had only established a civil defense office for the capital but two months before--were badly caught off guard by the aerial firestorm. Witness the helter-skelter nature of the evacuation of the capital that began immediately after the first raid, which particularly shocked Gellhorn.

At a street corner, in the early oncoming night, a woman flagged a bus and put her child on it. She did not have time to kiss the child good-bye and no one said anything. The woman turned and walked back into the bombed street. The bus was collecting children to take them away, anywhere, no one knew but out of the city. A curious migration started that afternoon and Went on all night. Lost children, whose parents were gone in the burning buildings or were separated in the confusion of the sudden attack, struggled out alone or in twos and threes, taking any road

 

Winter War/22

 

that led away from what they had seen. Days later the state radio was still calling their names, trying to find their families for them. Just as she had in her partisan but essential reliable reporting from Spain, Gellhorn her allowed her anger at the aggressor to seep through: "I thought it would be fine if the ones who order the bombings would walk on the ground some time and see what it is like."

Pack at the Kamp, Gellhorn's colleagues were jubilant. Now, after all the weeks or waiting, finally there was something to write about. One Canadian journal. I had just come back from the Western front, where all was still quiet, far too quiet. Only [a few] casualties over there and we have been hanging over there for weeks," he exclaimed. Obviously this new dustup between Finland and the Soviet Union was going to be a better show. One Danish journalist, who had witnessed the bomb attack on the train station and the attendant carnage, was perversely delighted. "I have an idea that this is going to be the best story of my career," the pleased scribe declared to no one in particular. "I’ve just been plain lucky. Everything has gone so well for me. Bus burning and everything.”

Pekka Tilikainen, a younger reporter for YLE, Finnish state radio, whose dispatches from around the battlefront would make him a star, interviewed some of the troops who bore the brunt of the first fighting: "We then came to Oravakyto," Tilikainen wrote in his memoir, Radioselostajana tulilinjoilla (Radio reporter at the front), "where we met the first troops who had been in the fighting. This was an infantry unit. In a darkened house we learned what war feels like. " Amongst the soldiers Tilikainen interviewed was a lieutenant by the name of Viskari and a sergeant named Reponen. "I asked them only one thing: 'How did it look and feel?' Usually in radio reporting, these questions are too bland to elicit a response, but not this time. [The boys] told of being right on the border when a few guards on a bridge met their deaths from a hail of bullets from an enemy machine gun. And then the action started."

According to the Finns Tilikainen interviewed, they had gotten the better of the invaders: "The Russians tried to attack, but were bloodily beaten back. Some of the enemy were able to advance in the gloom right up to a machine gun emplacement, but a merciless hail of bullets beat the Ivans back. The first attack was repulsed," wrote Tilikainen in Manichean terms popular at the time, "and the cradle of Karelia drank up the blood of the enemy. The snowdrifts were painted red.”

For his part, Geoffrey Cox, the veteran correspondent for the Daily Express who arrived in Helsinki on the evening of the thirtieth to find the city wreathed in flames, couldn't comprehend the reasoning behind the raid.

"Why did the Soviet carry out the raid?" wondered Cox, a native New Zealander who also had covered the Czechoslovak crisis and the Spanish Civil War for the British daily. "Was it a deliberate attempt to stun civilian morale? The answer [was] known only to the commanders of the Red Army." Cox concluded-and examination of Russian documents bears him out on this point- that the raid was intended for military objectives, but had been carried out clumsily. And yet the Kremlin must have known that even if the raid had been more accurate, it still

 

Winter War/23

 

would have caused civilian casualties. "What I believe to tell the truth," Cox decided, "is that the Russians made the attack because they thought the social structure of Finland was so rotten [that) one push would dislodge the present rulers [and] bring home the fact that the Russians meant business."

If so, as subsequent events would prove, the Russian rulers were badly misguided: "The Finns were more socially united than at any period since 1918. This sudden blow from the sky cemented cracks that still remained in that unity. Men of the Left who would have resented the return of Mannerheim were so infuriated by the brutality of this raid that they supported the war wholeheartedly. "Indeed," Cox continues, "the raid and the photographs it provided were used throughout Finland in the first month of the war as the main weapon of home propaganda. On every front, I was to visit later man after the man spoke angrily of this afternoon of November the 30th. I saw newspapers with photographs of the burning streets of Helsinki in peasants' homes and workers' flats all over the country. Not a little of the steel strength of Finnish morale in the war] was due to the raid on Helsinki."

 

                                                                        ****

 

ELEVEN kilometers away, CBS Radio Berlin bureau chief William Shirer, then on holiday in Switzerland, angrily listened to the first reports of the Soviet sneak attack from the capital of their erstwhile German allies. Constrained by the dictates of the Soviet-friendly German censorship, Shirer later reported the attack in equal tones. Privately, the noted American broadcaster could hardly contain himself. "The Soviet Union has invaded Finland!" he confided to his journal, which would later become the famous Berlin Diary. "The great champion of the working class, the mighty preacher against Fascist aggression, the righteous stander up for the 'scrupulous and punctilious observance of treaties, (to quote Molotov of a month ago), has fallen upon the most decent and workable little democracy in Europe in violation of half a dozen "solemn' treaties. I have raged for thirty hours," the livid radioman wrote, "[and] could not sleep.”

 

                                                                        ****

 

ACROSS the Atlantic that evening, in Washington, D.C, a train bearing President Franklin D. Roosevelt back to the capital from a short trip to his vacation home in Warm Springs, Georgia, was just pulling into Union Station when a special delegation from the state Department, comprising Secretary of State Cordell Hull and Undersecretary Sumner Welles, drove to the

 

Winter War/24

 

terminal to personally inform the president of the news of the Russian offensive. Special late editions with banner headlines about the attack were already on sale at the great terminal where the somber group went to meet Roosevelt's train.

Roosevelt, who six years previously had taken the politically unpopular move of recognizing the Soviet regime, was nonplussed by the news. Several hours earlier the cable informing the State Department of the Soviet invasion had triggered an internal debate there about the proper response, which would continue to roil Washington for weeks to come. The normally even-keeled Welles, in a rare temper, advocated breaking relations with the Kremlin. Hull, his ever. cautious superior, was doubtful. Such a decision might be exceedingly popular, he noted, but gradually the tide of indignation would recede and the State Department would be left "holding the bag. " Twenty-five years before, President Woodrow Wilson had been equally shocked by Germany's invasion of neutral Belgium--the "rape of Belgium," it was called.  The invasion, along with the well-publicized atrocities against Belgian civilians, was the first of a series of steps which helped break down American isolationism, and which led, two years later, to America joining the war.

Now Roosevelt used similar terminology to describe Russia's invasion of Finland. "This dreadful rape of Finland," the president described it in a letter to his friend, Thomas McVeagh. "People are asking why one should have anything to do with the present Soviet leaders because their idea of civilization and human happiness is so totally different from ours. The whole of the United States is not only horrified but thoroughly angry." At the same time, the interventionist-minded president was legally bound to follow a policy of strict neutrality. It was a policy FDR had been working to whittle down via a series of neutrality acts, a process that had begun in 1937 with his "Quarantine the Aggressor" speech in Chicago, a process that would culminate, two years later, with the United States becoming a virtual co-belligerent of Great Britain before the December 1941 Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor vitiated American neutrality.

Unquestionably, the Russian invasion of Finland was one stop on that journey. As Assistant Secretary of State Adolf Berle recorded in his diary several days after the Russian invasion, "U.S. neutrality is not as safe as it was a week ago." However, as much as FDR and millions of Americans sympathized with Finland, the fact remained that large segments of the American body politic, particularly business and labor, were still firmly isolationist (and would continue to be right up until Pearl Harbor). Evidently, all options were discussed at State, up to and including going to war. While Roosevelt pondered the matter, he agreed to meet with the Finnish minister, Hjalmar Procope.

 Procope, who had become a familiar person in the U.S. business world in the 1930s owing to his position as head of the Finnish Paper Association, had agreed to head the small, three-man Finnish legation in 1938 as tensions with the Soviet increased, with a view toward enlisting American diplomatic support to intercede with the Kremlin. Tall, suave, and well-spoken, Procope was already a fixture on the Washington cocktail party circuit. Now that Finland had suddenly become the cause celebre of the Christmas season, he would become even more

 

Winter War/25

 

sought after, never failing to seize an opportunity to use his considerable charm to plead Finland's case. Meeting with the president, Procope urged Roosevelt to break off relations with the Kremlin. FDR agreed to consider it. At the same time, he hoped to be able to help broker peace between the Finns and the Soviets, and he wondered if sundering relations with Moscow would prove counterproductive in that regard. (Ultimately, on the advice of Hull, he decided against it.)

Still, U.S. prestige, as well as popular opinion, demanded that the chief executive make a strong statement on the matter. Roosevelt's first move was so cautious as to be virtually meaningless: to issue a strong but generalized statement deploring the bombing of civilians that had occurred that day in Helsinki and urging both sides in the as yet undeclared war to forswear more such bombing. As one writer aptly put it, "The United States was now on record as being against evil.”

At the same time, the pigskin-loving president, former assistant naval secretary and diehard Navy football fan who was a fixture at the annual Army-Navy game in Philadelphia, had intimated that because of the Soviet invasion he was considering not attending the game: after seven years in office, the social schedule of the savior of America was followed with the same interest as that of a king. Not attending a football game: now that would be a statement.

By the following day, Roosevelt had considerably ratcheted up his rhetoric. He also made it perfectly clear whom the bad guys were: "The Soviet naval and military bombings within Finnish territory has come as a profound shock to the government and people of the United States. Despite efforts made to solve the dispute by peaceful methods.. one power has chosen to resort to force of arms." Strong words. And the president still hadn't decided yet whether he was going to attend the Army-Navy game. However, 350 Finnish Americans--in their excitement, the Helsingin Sanomat, the leading Finnish daily, reported 3,000 had already decided what they were going to do: they were going to fight. A week later, the men, who called themselves the Finnish American Legion, would sail for Helsinki to join the 12,000 other volunteers from around the world who voyaged to Finland to join the fight.

On the other side of the Bothnian Sea, the government of the other neutral country most affected by the war, Sweden, was also having an internal debate about how to react to the invasion. Some cabinet members, led by the activist foreign minister Rickard Sandler, advised all aid short of war, including setting up a joint defense with Finland to defend the Aland Islands, the semi-autonomous, Swedish-speaking, Finnish-controlled archipelago lying between the two countries. Other ministers demurred. Unlike the distant United States, which was in no immediate danger itself no matter what action it took, Sweden had to watch out. The wrong move could immediately bring down Russian--or German--bombers on its head.

Publicly, the government, led by Per Albin Hanson, the devoutly neutral Social Democratic prime minister, maintained a strict silence. There was no doubt, however, about how the Swedish public felt about the matter. "It is difficult to express the feeling of horror and anger that has swept the entire population of Sweden, Norway, and Denmark as the result of Russia's

 

Winter War/26

 

attack on Finland," wrote the Nordic correspondent for the New York Times on December 2. That same day 2,000 Swedish students descended on the Finnish embassy in Stockholm, crying, "We are for Finland!" and other pro-Finnish slogans, much as their kinsmen in Rome, Paris, and other cities had done.

Back in the Karelian combat zone, Olavi Eronen was busy shepherding the benumbed villagers of Seivasto westward to safety behind the Mannerheim Line. "I left at nightfall and gathered the people of the village together,” said Eronen. “Of course, all the able-bodied men were in the service, so only women, children, and the elderly were left. Never have I seen such silent people. Nobody said anything. Each one had their valuables wrapped up in a sheet. That was all that they could take with them. Of course, everyone left willingly. No one wanted to be overrun by the Russians. I drove them behind the lines, then another truck took them from there."

Amongst those who were evacuated from Karelia were Eva Kilpi and her family. "We were very much afraid of being taken to Siberia," she said. "Every child knew, rightly or wrongly, that they could be taken to Siberia. And that was a terrible feeling. We also knew that it was a total fight, that if we're not safe here, we're not safe anywhere."

 

                                                                        ****

 

TO be sure, the first Russian troops to penetrate into what had formerly been Finnish Karelia found the going surprisingly easy, as Dmitri Krutshih, then in command of a small Soviet patrol unit, later remembered. Krutshih had been told that there was a large wooden fence at the border:

 “So at 6 A.M. on November 3oth we arrived at the border, I asked the border guards, where is the Big Fence? There was no fence, just a path, that was it. So we Captured the first village. Then we moved forward. We captured the second village. Then we entered the third village… We surrounded Finnish forces and blew them to pieces.”

Seven hundred and twenty kilometers to the north, along the densely wooded, lightly defended Soviet-Fenno border near the central Finnish parish of Suomussalmi, advance elements of the Soviet 163rd Division, a scratch division that the Leningrad Military District had cobbled together for the operation, was also making excellent time. Its mission was to cut Finland off at its waist. The thousand or so people living in that remote area, mostly farmers and their families, most of whom were only vaguely aware of the recent tensions between the two countrie were if anything, even more surprised by the Russian invasion than their countrymen in the south, as one young resident of the nearby village of Saarikyla recalled E. (who the author interviewed, but who prefers to remain anonymous).  E, the sixteen-year-old daughter of a

 

Winter War/27

 

farmer, calmly going about her normal chores on the afternoon of the November 30 when her father went out for a walk. "When he returned," said E., "father said that there was a big fire in the direction of Juntusranta [another village]. He was wondering what was burning there." In the event, they soon learned, the smoke was coming from the main school building in Juntusranta, which the few panic-stricken Finnish civil guardsmen in the area had put to the torch in order to impede the rapidly advancing Soviet forces. The family soon discovered just how rapidly the Russians were advancing several hours later when E's father left the house to further investigate and ran smack into a number of Russian soldiers on horseback. Soon other mounted Russians appeared in the window of the farmhouse itself, to E. and her mother's consternation.

"My mother said that I must not go out, he will kill us," said E. "But I decided to go out to show them that there were only children inside. As I left, I ran into one of the soldiers and we looked each other in the eyes. 'Finski soldat?'" Were there any Finnish soldiers, the Russian asked in broken Swedish? "I said no, and with my hand I tried to show that we were only children," E. recalled in an emotional interview sixty-nine years later. "The soldier showed me his gun and asked me if I was afraid. But I was brave and said no. He laughed." All in all, the commanders of the four armies and twenty-six Soviet divisions participating in the initial, border-long assault could report to Kliment Voroshilov, the clueless defense commissar who was nominally in charge of the operation, that all was going according to plan.

What was the plan? Actually, there were two plans: the original plan, emphasizing one main thrust through the Karelian Isthmus, drawn up by Boris Shaposhnikov, previously the head of the Leningrad Military District, now head of the Soviet general staff, reflecting a clear-eyed assessment of Finnish capabilities, which Stalin had angrily discarded; and a subsequent, much flashier one, clearly influenced by the recent German blitzkrieg of Poland, and which the widely dispersed Soviet forces were now executing. The first plan, which Shaposhnikov had developed during the summer when the possible necessity of a "retaliatory strike" against Finland first arose, before the outbreak of the Second World War, had--wisely—assumed a harsh and difficult war lasting months, at least.

Shaposhnikov, one of the few tsarist holdovers who had managed to reach a high rank in the Red Army, as well as survive the purges of the 1930s, knew of which he spoke. He had visited Finland several times during his long career, including during his posting as commander of the Leningrad Military District-the same entity that had been entrusted with the new strike against Finland- between 1935 and 1937, before he had been promoted to chief of staff. He also—presciently--emphasized that any war against Finland had to be carried out quickly, or she would receive significant help from outside. Stalin, however, who generally valued the fifty-seven-year-old general's advice, scoffed at the latter's conservatism.

 "You are asking for such immense strength and resources to defeat a country like Finland," he declared. Instead, Stalin ordered Kirill Meretskov, who had succeeded Shaposhnikov as head of the Leningrad Military District, to draw up a new plan that would accomplish the desired result in a much shorter time. Meretskov later recalled the extraordinary scene when he met

 

Winter War/28

 

The Boss (as he called him). Also present was “an important Comintern official and well-known activist of the world Communist movement" by the name of Otto Ville Kuusinen. "I was told of the concern caused to our leadership by the anti-Soviet line of the Finnish government."or "Finland," Stalin said, "could easily become a bridgehead for anti-Soviet action by either of the two main imperialist groupings--the German or the Anglo-French. If Finland should strike, various counteractions were made open to us. I was made responsible for drawing up a plan to protect the frontier from aggression, and to plan a counterattack against the Finnish armed forces. "

"An amazing scene!" wrote the Russian historian Edward Radzinsky. "Not one of those present, of course, seriously thought that little Finland would attack the immense [Soviet] empire. Nobody seriously believed that Hitler, with whom they were just concluding successful negotiations, or England or France, to whom they were also talking, would launch an 'action against the Soviet Union' from Finland." Meretskov, Stalin, and Kuusinen "all knew they were really talking about preparations for the annexation of Finland.

"The negotiations with the Finns over territory had been a ruse, after all, or at least partly so. At some point during the fall, the Russian dictator, evidently encouraged by the Soviet embassy's fanciful reports that the "oppressed' Finns were ripe for "liberation" as well as the urgings of Andrei Zhdanov, the Communist boss of Leningrad, who had long been making aggressive noises about Finland, had revised his plans. Now he no longer merely wanted Finnish territory; he wanted Finland. Not the type to ask questions, Meretskov, one of the few middle-level Soviet generals of any ability who had survived the purges, hastily proceeded to devise a “defensive" plan to counter the Finns' contemplated "aggression" in two or three weeks by means of a co-ordinated westward advance by four different armies at eight different points along the entire length of the Soviet-Fenno border.

Under that plan, one army, the 7th, comprising twelve to fourteen divisions, would attack Finnish defenses along the Mannerheim Line on the isthmus. A second army, the 8th, composed of six rifle divisions and two tank brigades, would turn the northern flank of the isthmus defense by circling around Lake Ladoga's north shore, breaking through the relatively thin Finnish lines there, and striking south to take the fortifications from the rear. A third army, the oth, consisting of five rifle divisions and a number of attached armored units, was to thrust westward across Finland's waist at Suomussalmi toward the Bothnian Sea, cutting the country in half. Finally, a fourth army, the 14th, consisting of three divisions with attached armor, would sweep down from the north, capturing the arctic port of Petsamo, and eventually the Lappish capital of Rovaniemi.

In truth, Meretskov's revised plan had a number of things going for it. The meteorological timing was right: Finland's rivers and lakes had begun to freeze, allowing Soviet forces to move rapidly, particularly in the isthmus, while the snows of deep winter that the Finns thrived in had yet to arrive. Also, the new plan had the element of surprise: as Mannerheim readily admitted, he was not prepared for the number of troops the Russians used north of Ladoga. It even might have worked--indeed, at one point during the first week of the war, came close to

 

Winter War/29

 

working--had the demoralized, poorly led and coordinated Red Army of 1939 with which it had been entrusted been the better led, pre-purge Red Army of 1937. Nevertheless, as would soon become clear, Meretskov's plan was far too ambitious. It dispersed forces amongst too many salients and was also based on both an insufficient understanding of Finnish topography and, perhaps most important, a gross underestimate of the intelligence and character of the Finnish soldier and the resilience of the Finnish nation."Not that Stalin himself was concerned. So confident was the Soviet generalissimo of the success of his armies and the flashy, nine-prong invasion plan "that he didn't even bother to take a meeting [of the Politburo]," future Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev recalled. "He thought all he had to do was fire a few artillery shots and the Finns would capitulate."

Shortly past midnight on December I, as a train evacuating the eduskunta made its way to the secret location in the town of Kauhajoki in Ostrobothnia and Helsinki continued to blaze, Gustaf Mannerheim's first order of the day was broadcast over national radio.

His stirring message was directed as much to the Finnish people as to the hard-pressed Finnish army, now struggling to contain the Soviet intruder. It was difficult for some Finns to understand Mannerheim, a member of the country's Swedish-speaking minority whose command of Finnish, the country's main language and that of go percent of his troops, was rusty. Few Finns minded.

"Brave Finland soldiers," he declared. "I undertake this task at an hour when our hereditary enemy once again attacks our country. Confidence in its chief is the first condition of success. You know me and I know you, and I know the whole country is ready to fulfill its duty unto the death."

Now the Kremlin, and the world, had its answer: Finland would fight. But for how long? And with what?

                                                                        ****

 

Off The Map: Chapter 3

An excerpt from Gordon Sander’s book Off The Map: A Personal History of Finland

LOST IN FINLAND

“Aland is a practically independent country”

--From a brochure about Aland published in Mariehamn

“Rat poison.

Small or large?

Large.

What does it do?

It kills.

Good.”

--Kati Outenen in Match Factory Girl (1990)

THE BOAT TRIP from Turku to Mariehamn, the so-called capital of the Aland Islands, as anyone who has taken it can attest, is quite special. I should know: I’ve taken it half a dozen times over the last twenty years. Aland is very much part of my Finland.

It seems like every few years I am there again, on the top deck of the Silja or one of the other interchangeable, tax free cruise ships that travel the “archipelago route,” from the southwest coast of Finland to and through the 6,500 various skerries and islands that make up the archipelago, hair blowing in the wind, drink in hand, leaning over the handrail, watching this little uninhabited stretch of land—imagining a solitary clapboard house with an invisible sign over the door that says, “If you lived here you would be home by now!”...and another…as the circling gulls above provide air cover…escort…and all the while feeling as if I am leaving the civilized world with all its worries and cares behind.

I vividly recall my first trip to Aland, in September 1990. My contacts in Helsinki weren’t particularly encouraging of my Alandic sortie. “Why on earth would you want to go there?” someone asked me. “There are so many other more interesting things here in Finland for you to investigate.”

Overall, the impression I got was that most Finns, i.e., many Finnish-speaking Finns, regarded the 24,000 some odd inhabitants of the semi-autonomous, Swedish speaking archipelago located betwixt Finland and Sweden—not to mention Europe’s only officially demilitarized zone (and don’t you forget it!)—as a bunch of spoiled ingrates who took more from the country to which they begrudgingly belonged than they gave back.

There were also some hard feelings on the mainland after a Finnish naval boat docked in Mariehamn, and some of the crew decided to go ashore in uniform, leading to an official reprimand from the put-out Aland authorities. Fancy that! Never mind that those same sailors were protecting Aland.

Of late, I also understood, some of the more rabid Alanders had even formed their own independence movement. Well, good riddance to them!

All of which, of course, only made me look forward more to my journey to the Aland Zone.

Yes, it was a memorable visit indeed. Originally I had planned on spending ten days, beginning with a visit long enough for me to research the article I was writing about Aland, followed by a sojourn somewhere deep in the archipelago where I could really cool out; after completing my first book, a biography of Rod Serling, the creator of the Twilight Zone, I really needed to be away, and the Aland Zone (so to speak) struck me as an ideal place for doing that.

This proved true—in fact I wound up zoning out so well in that I nearly drowned in the process.

***

AS ALWAYS, my first stop on the Aland Islands was in Mariehamn.

For a seaside town that likes to think of itself as a world class resort, I was surprised (and still am) at the relative lack of luxurious hotels.

But who needs luxurious hotels when you have the vast Mariehamn harbor, with sailboats tacking to and fro at your feet, and a windswept promenade culminating in the wacky open air Mariehamn zoo, or the elegant tree-lined Storagatan that links the eastern side of the Mariehamn peninsula to the west?

As for indoors attractions, there was, of course, the award-winning Aland Museum, where one could immerse oneself in the convoluted history of the anomalous islands from prehistoric times through the fondly recalled Swedish period and on. I had certainly read up on its history and was fascinated by it. There was the Russian period that was punctuated by the pulverization of the great Bomarsund fortress by Admiral Napier’s men o’war during the Crimean War, and the attempts by forlorn islanders during the First World War to reattach themselves to their former motherland, not to mention the historic 1921 League of Nations decision, from which the islands derived their unique semi-autonomous status. I found the island’s Nautical Museum truly magical; one could vicariously relive the great days of the great Alandic four-masters via a splendid assortment of maritime canvases on display there. And of course to see what the real thing looked like, the majestic Pommern, now a museum ship, was near by.

Aland has always had its own veritable culture, and its own literature, including a number of authors like Sally Salminen, author of the prize-winning Katrina, about the life of a doughty 19th immigrant to Aland and her struggles. There is also Anni Blomqvist, the bard of Simskäla, and winner of the Pro Finlandia prize, who had received acclaim in both sides of the Gulf of Bothnia. The archipelago even boasted its own poet laureate, Karl Erik Bergman, a native fisherman who putatively wrote his nautical-based verses in between working his herring and laveret nets.

In fact, Aland even boasted its own cuisine, including the justly celebrated Aland pancakes, preferably served with stewed plums and whipped cream.

Mmm. I reminded myself to stop off and get some of those, perhaps on my way to purchase some stunning Aland postage stamps. I always picked up some stamps when visiting, if only to throw the folks back home off. One could almost picture them looking at the stamp and saying to themselves, Aland. Where the ___ is that?

Needless to say I sent a lot of post cards on my first trip to Aland. In fact, I was so taken by the sheer quirkiness of the place that I decided to write up my first story about Aland in the form of a running commentary via post card, dispensing different installments to each of my editors, such that the whole would form a kind of, how should I say, archipelagic account.

Thus:

September 4, 1990

Dear Mike,

Fred is the word for ‘peace’ in Swedish, but it really ought to be Aland, the name of these beguiling islands lying between Finland and Sweden. Aland was declared a demilitarized zone by Russia in 1856, after its forces had been blasted out of the water by an Anglo-French expedition during the Crimean War, a status that was given international status in 1921 after the League of Nations gave Aland to Finland—over the protests of the inhabitants who wanted to be repatriated with Sweden, which owned the archipelago prior to 1809. Now Alanders appear to be content with their self-governing, demilitarized status, which frees their men from having to serve in the Finnish armed forces (a cause of some resentment on the mainland), and makes this place a natural setting for meditating on the future of the world.

Peace baby,

Agent Sander

Isn’t it extraordinary how much one can fit on a post card, especially when one has ingested five cups of strong Alandic coffee?

Yes, Mariehamn ‘tis a very pleasant place indeed.

I’ll never forget realizing how government-intensive it was there. I remember witnessing the sweeping Landskapsregering complex, which includes the lavish four story glass-enclosed Lagtinget, the Alandic parliament,with plush seats and a great mural relating the story of how Aland achieved its independence—sorry, semi-independence. There is also an adjoining, even larger Administration Building with surprisingly tight security (as if anyone wished to attack the Aland government; but of course you never know….) and dozens of bespectacledarchipel-acrats contentedly dashing about, attending to this piece of pressing archipelagic business or that.

As far as the so-called Alandic independence movement was concerned, that was really much ado about nothing, the courteous Aland official I interviewed one crystal blue day in September 1992 assured me. Yes, in fact, there was such an “independence” party, he confirmed, however polls had shown that no more than 10 percent of the Aland population favored outright independence. The vast majority of Alanders were indeed quite happy with their special status. And, after all, why shouldn’t they be? I recall asking if the official felt the locals were spoiled in a way.

“That is not for us to say,” he replied, diplomatically.

It seemed clear that the majority of Alanders were quite content to let Helsinki administer their defense and foreign affairs. Besides, the idea of Aland having its own navy—no less its own air force—was a self-evidently foolish one.

The preponderance of Alanders were quite content to let the Finnish navy and air force patrol the archipelagic skies and waters. And of course, the Finnish navy was welcome—just as long as the crew took its liberty in civvies.

This particular Aland official assured me that Alanders were extremely proud of, and indeed grateful for their unique status with Helsinki, and how well it worked—at least for them. Indeed, it worked so well that of late it was attracting interest from other governments around the world who were seeking a workable formula to deal with their respective linguistic minorities. For example, in Moscow, Mikhail Gorbachev and his reformist comrades were desperately looking for a way to keep the restive Baltic Socialist Soviet Republics of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania from leaving the Communist reservation altogether.

Of course, Aland officials took pains to point out, the “Aland model,” per se only worked for Aland because it was a) wealthy and b) monolingual, conditions that didn’t really correspond with the relatively impoverished Baltic republics, with their large Russian-speaking minorities.

Mariehamn nevertheless wished Mr. Gorbachev the best of luck while allowing the U.S.S.R. to maintain its large consulate-cum-listening station in Mariehamn, a legacy of old Russian imperial days, when Aland was still considered a strategic point, along with the crumbling ruins of Bormasund.

***

AS QUAINT as Aland has always been to me, and I’ve taken several trips there since 1990, it never takes long before I realize that there is only so much one can do in Mariehamn. After two visits to the Aland Museum, the returns tend to diminish. Ditto to the Mariehamn zoo, as much as I love the free range peacocks there. In September 1990, I was sick of Aland pancakes in days.

It was time to voyage into the heart of the archipelago; to have a real Aland experience; to be alone, to think, to recharge.

Gunnar, my host, from the Aland Tourist Board, had the perfect place in mind: a four star cottage smack in the middle of the archipelago, in the village of Björkö, in the district of Finström.

“Very isolated” he assured me, shortly before we departed for my archipelagic hideaway.

“Deluxe. Comes with a sauna. You’ll love it.”

There was something else.

“Oh yes,” Gunnar mentioned, before he left me to pack my bags.

“Have you heard?

Your President Bush and Mr. Gorbachev have decided to have a summit meeting in Helsinki on Thursday.”

***

“YOU MUST be joking,” I replied.

“No, I’m quite serious,” he said. A call to Helsinki and my old friend Matti Kohva of Finn Facts confirmed it. My president, the Right Honorable George Bush, then in the midst of preparing the American response to Saddam Hussein’s shock invasion of Kuwait, had indeed scheduled a meeting with his Soviet counterpart in order to clear signals with the Russian leader for the anticipated action, soon to be known as The Gulf War.

Koivo sounded quite enthused about the te-te-te. “It’s really a very big deal for us,” he said, “just as big as the [1975] Helsinki Accords.”

“You really have timed your return to Finland very well!”

Had I. My knack for being in Finland when a news story of international import took place had indeed struck again (I had been there thirteen years earlier for the hijacking of Finnair flight 405).

For his part, Gunnar was rather blasé about the affair—as if the bilateral confabulation was taking place in a different universe, rather than the capital of the country to which this anomalous, self-governing, Swedish-speaking “province” putatively belonged. Then again, that was very much the way Alanders regarded anything that took place outside of Aland, including (and especially) on the Finnish-speaking mainland.

A summit in Helsinki? Who cared? That indeed seemed to be the prevailing sentiment amongst the Alanders I spoke to.

Saddam Hussein? The prospect of a new Middle East war? These were not matters that concerned the average Alander.

Still, I was concerned and obviously would have to go. After all, it wasn’t everyday that I had a chance to cover an international summit, no less in Helsinki. Obviously it would be quite a show, and quite a moment for Helsinki, and for Finland. Destiny had struck again.

But first the island of Björkö beckoned. It was now Monday. The summit was scheduled for Thursday. I would have two days to enjoy my little retreat—not a week, as I had hoped. That was all right. Besides, who knew, perhaps I would have a chance to meet Gorby himself!

And so I sent a postcard off to one of my editors back in The Real World and off to Björkö we went.

September 6, 1990

Dear Jeff,

Dos and Don’ts of Alands:

DO:

1. Rent a bicycle; it’s really the best way to experience this out-of-the-world archipelago

2. Try the local herring

3. Also the pancakes

DON’T:

1. Say you’ve never heard of Aland (even if you haven’t). The Alanders are very sensitive.

2. Come tanned; you may be mistaken for a gypsy and manhandled by blotto Alanders at the Club Arkipelag (the place to go hereabouts).

3. Say: “So what’s the point of having your own flag and stamps if you can’t have your own army and navy?”

4. Buy anything.

***

I was in an exuberant state of mind as we drove off in the direction of Björkö, and my feelings only increased when our car stopped at the end of a dirt road and I beheld the magical hideaway that awaited me. Unfortunately that same giddiness came very close to being my undoing.

Gunnar had been right. The cottage, if that was the word for it, was indeed four star, a large, spotless, well-furnished affair, complete with two guest rooms and state of the art kitchen and sauna.

“OK?”

“You bet,” I grinned.

Yes, the cottage would do. Best of all, to my surprise and delight, the cottage, which was situated on a short hill overlooking a small bay, “came” with its very own miniature island (so to speak), a thickly forested speck of land which lay perhaps two hundred meters away from the shoreline. A rowboat invitingly lay near by.

I already knew what my first recreational activity would be.

“Ok then,” Gunnar said, driving off. “I’ll see you in two days.”

And then he was gone.

Needless to say, the cottage had no phone; this was still the pre-mobile era. Anyway, I wouldn’t have wanted a phone. I wanted to be alone. Now I was. Not a soul in sight. Although there were a few houses nearby, they were clearly shuttered. After all, this was September, when all the Swedish-speaking owners had migrated back to the mainland. There I was.

Alone in the dead center of Aland, no less with my very own four star cottage, and my own island!

Shazam! Got to check that out!

In minutes I had raced down the hill, jumped into the rowboat and was happily rowing towards to the little island. Upon arriving on the tree-lined shoreline, I quickly disembarked, tied the boat to a tall shrub and made my way to the center of the approximately two thousand meter long one thousand meter wide island, which culminated in a short hill that I duly climbed before performing a short Zorba-like dance of celebration, winding up with my own take on Jimmy Cagney’s character in White Heat when he is cornered by the police on the top of a gas refinery with the shout out:

“MADE IT MA! TOP OF THE WORLD!”

At least it felt that way, standing there on that little hillock in the middle of that little forested island in the center of the Aland archipelago. After a bit, it was time to head back to the cottage. The light was falling. Better hurry up. Carefully I made my way through the thick knot of pine trees that enrobed the island to the spot where I had tied my boat and prepared to row back.

There was only one problem: the boat wasn’t there. I looked across the bay at my cottage—or at least what I thought was my cottage…

Hmmm. I could have sworn I tied it up here…

Not to worry: I was never one who panicked easily. I was positive that I had knotted the line to the tree securely (and as a former camp boating counselor I knew my knots).

It has to be somewhere here, I said to myself, as I made my way along the shoreline, searching for the missing vessel. No way it could have floated away.

Hmmm. So where was it?

I went along the rocky mini-coastline, back and forth...

An hour had elapsed. By now, I had examined every meter of what was rapidly beginning to feel like my Elba. Still no boat.

The sky was darkening quickly, the way it does in the northern latitudes in the autumn. The temperature had dropped. A blustery wind picked up. It was getting cold. This was beginning to weird me out.

Shivering, I renewed my search. Back and forth I went along the beach.

Another hour had passed.

It was almost dark now. What to do? Obviously there was only one thing to do: make a swim for it.

There was only one problem. The water was cold; very cold. I reasoned I didn’t have much choice in the matter.

I couldn’t remain on the island over night. Besides, the cottage was not that far away, surely no more than a ten minute swim. An excellent swimmer, I was not deterred. Still the water was kind of cold.

Slowly, I advanced into the water and prepared to swim across the channel. Boy was that water cold. In seconds the water was up to my chest. I could feel that there was a current, a strong one. And did I mention how cold that water was? What the hell?

Then, I paused for a second.

Something (common sense? survival instinct?) came over me.

I looked back at the darkened island, all two thousand square meters of it. I peered again at the far shore, where my cottage was, a stone’s throw away.

Nothing was clear. The night was descending quickly. I squinted: it was difficult to see anything at that point. I was lost in the middle of Aland—which, in September, was the equivalent of being lost in the middle of nowhere.

Was that my house? No, that was…

A growing sense of dread fell over me. A flock of suspiciously predatory-like birds circled overhead.

What the hell. I took another step into the water.

Wait—wait, my internal lifeguard cuffed me. Don’t be an idiot. This is stupid. Of course you tied up the boat. You just weren’t looking in the right place for it…

I looked back again at the island.

Could it be—was it possible?—was the boat on the other side of the island?

Retracing my steps, I returned to the island and walked back over the little hillock, down the opposite side, and sure enough, there was my rowboat and salvation neatly tied to a linden tree, just where I had left it. And there, on the other side of the little strait, the only one with lights on, was my cottage.

It would seem my little Alandic dance of thanksgiving had caused me to lose my bearings and come down on the western, or wrongside of the islet, however because, in the hall of mirrors that is Björkö, the vista facing that side is virtually the same as the one facing the eastern side, i.e., the one where I had actually set out from. And I couldn’t tell the difference until it was too late. Or almost too late…

Shaking my head, I slowly rowed back. If I had continued to swim I would have swam in the wrong direction and wound up who knows where.

After that introduction, my stay in Björkö was blissfully uneventful, as I treated myself to several saunas, made friends with the local flora and fauna, and closely followed the weather reports on Swedish tv, while pondering what I would ask Mr. Gorbachev at Finlandia Hall.

***

TWO DAYS later, my beaming host returned to pick me up and take me to the Mariehamn airport, so I could take the plane to the summit and put my question to Gorby.

I had had a fine time, I assured him. The cottage’s four stars were indeed well deserved. Then I told him about the little adventure I had had the first day.

He immediately turned pale.

“Lost?!” he exclaimed.

“If you had made that swim you wouldn’t merely have been lost. The current is extremely strong at that spot. And the water is too cold for anyone to swim for more than ten minutes or so before freezing. You would have drowned. No question. I would put money on it.”

He went on to point out that, in the unlikely event that I had indeed made it to the other side of the cove, it would have been the wrong side, and I would have been cold and shivering and completely lost in the dark, not an especially pleasing prospect, either.

“You wouldn’t have made it. I am quite sure of that.”

“Right,” I gulped.

I had had my Alandic experience. It was time to return to civilization and the summit.

***

SEVERAL HOURS later, I was one of the nine hundred some odd accredited journalists seated in Finlandia Hall anxiously waiting for Messrs. Bush and Gorbachev to appear from the wings for their scheduled joint press conference about their epochal pow wow. There was an undeniable feeling of excitement in the air. Above and beyond the summit’s immediate agenda—the invasion of Kuwait—it really seemed like we were witnessing the end of the Cold War, right there in Finlandia Hall.

“Our relationship is changing, has changed even from that of adversaries to one of partners,” a spokesman for the Soviet Foreign Ministry told a group of us before Bush and Gorbachev took the stage. “Such a meeting would [have been] unimaginable five, even three years ago, but today it seems altogether natural, normal, maybe even a little overdue.

“Some will say,” he continued, “that we are trying to impose a settlement [on Saddam], to make others bend to our will. That’s not true. We couldn’t do it if we tried. But shouldn’t the world be thankful that the two superpowers are trying to live up to their responsibilities for world peace?”

What a show, I thought, and what a moment for Finland! Behind the two superpower leaders, mounted on guidons, on each side of which were arrayed two sets of flags, the American stars and stripes, and the Soviet hammer and sickle on the outside. In the middle stood the proud white and blue banner of Finland.

To be sure, the Finnish hosts of the extraordinary “emergency” summit—the second that Bush and Gorbachev had held since the onset of the Iraq crisis—could not have been more pleased, as well as pleased with themselves—and deservedly so. With only three days to prepare, the shortest time ever for such an event, and the first time since the 1975 Helsinki Accords that Suomi had played host to a meeting of comparable magnitude, the government had clearly done a spot-on job of getting ready for the conclave.

I noted how the Finns certainly seemed to have gotten their public relations act together since the ’77 Aeroflot hijacking, which was the last time I had been to such an event in Helsinki, Every journalist who attended this summit had a contact person from the Foreign Ministry assigned to him or her; a perfectly stacked pile of literature about the summit and Finland; invitations to attend an array of briefings, and a glossy map of Helsinki. And the refreshments, including of the liquid kind, I was pleased to see, were up to snuff as well.

Perhaps more importantly for the Finns, this particular summit also provided bilateral recognition and validation for the Urho Kekkonen’s much-vaunted policy of active neutrality, and thus was aiding in finally banishing the big bad ghost of Finlandization forever. Just the year before the much-lauded Soviet leader had explicitly recognized Finnish neutrality during his landmark, and enthusiastically visited Helsinki the year before. And now, here he was, accompanied by his wildly popular wife, quickly seconded by President Bush.

THE TWO SUPERPOWER LEADERS PRAISE FINLAND FOR ITS HOSPITALITY

the lead story of the Helsingin Sanomat fairly sang out in its issue of September 8, 1990.

In this sense, the 1990 Bush-Gorbachev summit was the apotheosis of postwar Finnish foreign policy. Little wonder that the Finnish diplomats I met at Finlandia Hall looked pleased with themselves. Was this not what they had been working for all these years?

“If only The Old Man was around to see this,” a veteran diplomat gushed.

Privately, however, some of the more realistic officials were worried. As any sober-minded person who had followed recent reports from behind the increasingly brittle Iron Curtain could attest, the Soviet empire was now in an active state of dissolution, a process that had been initiated and accelerated by Gorbachev himself.

The genie of freedom was very much out of the bottle.

Meanwhile, and most vitally, as far as the Finns were concerned, the air was rapidly going out of the Russian economy. Russia might well still be Finland’s most favored customer, but the customer had palpably less money to spend, a development which was already having serious consequences for the Finnish economy.

Already, by time I checked back into the Klaus Kurki, the amount of trade the Russians transacted with the Finns had dwindled to less than 10 percent of Finnish exports, and, in light of the increasing chaos within the crumbling USSR there didn’t appear to be much prospect of that changing; indeed, that figure would nose dive further.

Much was made of Gorbachev’s querulous visage upon his arrival, as well as the amount of time before his meeting with Bush at the Soviet embassy, presumably dealing with his mounting domestic mounting troubles.

In this respect, the much-ballyhooed summit, as laudable as it was, was a false apotheosis, at least for the Finns. No sooner that the Finns had emerged from the shadow of the Soviet Bear and the postwar “twilight zone” period than they found themselves entering a new, for many even more frightening tunnel of uncertainty.

All well and good that Gorbachev had once again endorsed Finnish neutrality, but how much good did that do, my Finnish friends wondered, if he was not in charge of his own government or people, and if the ruble was worthless?

As I stood watching US Secretary of State James Baker and Soviet foreign minister Edvard Shevardnadze, walking onto the stage, followed by their bosses, Bush and Gorbachev, the hall was swept with rapturous applause. We all rose.

And yet I couldn’t help but wonder: what were we applauding, exactly? The end of the cold war, yes—and the beginning of what? Who knew?

***

WHILE I was in town for the summit, I took the opportunity to reacquaint myself with Helsinki.

The city looked the same. There was the giant radio set of the central railroad station. The rumbling green trams still sounded the same. And yes, too, some old men were still playing with oversized chess sets in Toolo Park.

However the city felt different. Summer was over; the local residents were already going into their traditional emotional hibernation. And yet, if you looked closely at the faces of the shoppers hurrying by on Mannerheimintie, you could sense a frisson of fear—not the grim, familiar fear of the “Soviet time,” but a new, inchoate fear about what was to come.

Rumors circulated of an impending invasion from the East, not by the Red Army, but by the impoverished Russian and former Soviet peoples themselves.

And have you seen those Estonian prostitutes in front of the Forum? What’s next?

I reasoned, however, taking into account the history of Berlin during the nineteen twenties, that an uncertain time could also be an exhilarating one. Finland’s mental and cultural boundaries were becoming blurred, and many people, especially artists and young people, were less concerned with putting bread on the table, less frightened of the Russian hordes putatively about to descend on them (or Estonian prostitutes for that matter), and instead found that suddenly Helsinki was an interesting place to be. The terra firma beneath Finland was palpably cracking open, and through those cracks there now emerged an arresting and enticing skein of art forms, new thinking and new phenomena.

There was a lot of buzz about a filmmaker named Aki Kaurismaki, whose most recent film, Ariel, had been the talk of Cannes. Sounded like someone I should know more about.

Fortunately, my editors in New York and London agreed.

“Go to it,” one of my editors said. “We need stuff about Finland. I think the last time we ran something about Finnish culture was during World War II. Maybe before.”

I was about to lose myself in a new archipelago—a cultural archipelago, as it were—and I would spend the next few years delightedly swimming from one island to another and writing up what I found.

In The Shadow of the Peace: Prologue

An excerpt from Gordon Sander’s forthcoming book on Finland: “In The Shadow of the Peace”

PROLOGUE

March 13, 1940

RECEIVED WISDOM is that November 30, 1939, the first day of the Winter War, was the most shocking day in Finnish history.

Of course there is no doubt that November 30th was traumatizing for Finns. Anyone who is old enough to be there on that fateful day and saw the Soviet SB2 bombers emerge out of the cloud cover over Helsinki and witnessed the death and destruction the aerial intruders wrought, or who has seen the horrifying newsreels from that day, including the passenger bus in front of Central Station that was incinerated along with its occupants, with the smoldering remains of one of the passengers lying near by, can attest to that. November 30th was indeed Finland’s day of infamy, as US President Franklin Roosevelt described the Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbor that signalled the start of World War II two years later.

November 30th was Finland’s Pearl Harbor.

***

AND yet, as those dwindling number of Finns who are old enough, and sapient enough to remember, there is another day in Finnish history that was possibly even more traumatic than November 30 th : March 13, 1940 the heart-stopping day when Vaino Tanner, the Finnish foreign Minister announced that an armistice between Moscow and Helsinki had been reached and the 105-day-old war--a war which many Finns had actually thought they were winning--had suddenly come to a stop.

It had been only two days since the Finnish people, who had been shielded from the bitter truth by the zealous press censors, had first learned that negotiations with the hated Russkies were underway.

Still, few imagined that the Talvisota, a war into which the entire nation had enthusiastically thrown itself, a war in which Suomi had suffered so much and lost thousands of its soldiers and fought so hard, could possibly end the way it did.

And yet that is exactly what happened that dread day, Finland’s true day of infamy, eight three years ago.

****

NONE of the dozens of foreign journalists who had descended on Finland to report the David and Goliath war and were bivouacked at the Hotel Kamp, would ever forget March 13th . Of all the passages in the droves of books and articles the members of the so-called Kamp Corps would write about their experiences during the Talvisota, the most moving are the ones the Finn- friendly correspondents wrote about what they saw and felt as they walked the streets of the capital that day and beheld the faces of the stunned, grief-stricken Finns around them.

The experience was all the more vivid—and painful—for the newsmen because, unlike the people around them, they had been tipped off about what was coming. This was one scoop they would rather not have had.

At the Kamp, Geoffrey Cox, the veteran New Zealand newsman who had reported the duration of the war, had spent the night of March 12th in a state of suspended animation, waiting for confirmation of the dread news that the peace treaty with Moscow had been signed, as he wrote in his memoir:

That night of the 12th of March I walked around in the blackout, past the heaps of snow piled by footpaths, to the Press Room. Every correspondent knew that tonight we would probably hear something. I looked around the Press Room that night, at the green-covered tables with files of translations from the Finnish press, the photos of Suomssalmi on the walls, the heavy curtains drawn for the blackout. Here I had head the first communique of the war read out; here I had seen Miss Helsinkis, the pretty Finnish girl who acted as chief secretary, looking every night for the figures of Russian planes brought down.

Cox asked the Finnish girl how she felt now. “I live in Viipuri,” she responded, sadly, “Last week I saw on a newsreel my flat, smashed to pieces by a bomb. But I don’t mind that so much as stopping the fight now that we have suffered so much.

Later that agonizing evening of March 12th, Cox’s fellow scribe, Leland Stowe, the veteran correspondent for The Chicago Daily News, who would become one of the best known reporters of World War II, was sitting upstairs in the room of Walter Kerr, the writer for the New York Herald Tribune, along with a number of other journalists—including Cox, who had since decided to take out his anxieties on the typewriter. “We tried to cover the heartbreak of it all with feeble jokes,” he wrote, “They all fell flat.”

Pressed for news, Laurin Zilliacus, durable Finnish press officer who had conducted many of the briefings for the Kamp Corps, now visibly depressed, conceded that it was possible that peace terms had been signed in Moscow; however, he assumed that the eduskunta hadn’t voted on them. Otherwise, he would have heard.

At least one Finn couldn’t wait. “Then,” Stowe later wrote, “the phone rang and a Finnish friend was called. He laid down the receiver and said in a dull voice: ‘The first of our friends has just committed suicide.’ It was a young woman, a writer by profession.’”

Shortly after the journalists were summoned again to the press room. Zillacus was standing mutely in front of the silent, smoke-filled room. “Fighting will stop at eleven tomorrow,” the dazed young man said, forgetting that “tomorrow” was actually that same day.

“His voice was that of a man at a funeral,” Stowe recalled. “For a moment no one spoke. Then the room slowly emptied, as correspondent after correspondent went to type out his cable telling the world that Russia had won.”

Tanner, the foreign minister, Zillacus added bleakly, was to speak to the Finnish people at mid-day, detailing the terms of the shock armistice.”

****

SEVERAL hundred kilometers to the east, on the bomb-gutted Karelian Isthmus, astonished Finnish officers began receiving word of the imminent ceasefire, which they passed on to their equally shocked men, who tried to get to a safe place to protect themselves from the Soviet artillery, which were intent on shelling Finnish positions until the last minute—and possibly beyond that as well.

Horribly, a number of Finnish troops and foreign volunteers were killed after the official ceasefire time of 11 am by the vindictive Soviets. In the north just such a tragedy took place near Salla, when the Russians deliberately bombed an outfit of Swedish and Norwegian volunteers, who had recently taken over the fighting for their Finnish brothers there, causing numerous casualties.

Perhaps unsurprisingly there were a lot of Finns who wanted to keep on fighting too, as Geoffrey Cox wrote:

At Kuhmo one company warned that they must stop fighting at 11 o’clock Finnish time, had hurled themselves against a Russian position at dawn in their anger and fought until almost every man was wiped out.

At Viipuri a Finnish icebreaker, sent in to try and crack the ice of the bay and cut off the Russians on the western shore—a brilliant strategic move—kept moving at 11 o’clock. Russians fired on it, killing seventy men.

At Taipale, on the blood-soaked Karelian isthmus, where Finnish troops had held their positions since the beginning of the war, and had continued to repulse the onrushing Soviet berserkers until the bitter end, some of the men actually stood and cheered the news of the ceasefire, thinking that it was the Russians who had succumbed, not them. That was how little they knew what was going on.

It was only later that horrible, endless day of March 13 th when they realized their mistake that the Finns got angry.

By then, of course, it was too late to keep on fighting, but how they wanted to, as Leland Stowe recorded, “At eleven o’clock the order to cease firing was given along the entire front. Finnish soldiers who could scarcely stand received it first with astonished disbelief and then with bitter cries of protest. ‘To hell with it all. It would be better to go on.’”

“Without munitions, without artillery, the Finns asked nothing except to fight on. In their hearts, they were never defeated.”

****

BUT sadly, horribly, tragically, they were.

Now in Helsinki, and elsewhere, the reality of that fact was about to sink in as the country braced itself for the supreme shock of Tanner’s armistice speech.

That morning of March 13th , Stowe had tried to prepare Clara, his loyal assistant, for the traumatic news.

“I had warned Clara that peace was coming and she had cried ‘No, no!” And then fiercely [after he told her what suspected would be the final terms]: ‘But we’ll fight if we have nothing but our knives….Hanko? They will take Hanko? I tell you our children and our grandchildren would fight to take Hanko back.”

“No,” Clara had insisted, “they can never do that to us.” ‘

****

BUT, as Vaino Tanner confirmed in the address he bravely made to the country that day, surely one of the most painful addresses any politician has had to make to his own people, “they”—the members of the Finnish government who had been charged with the dread duty of negotiating with Stalin and Molotov—had indeed done it.

Not that “they” had had much choice, although it would take some time before shocked Finns could accept that immutable fact.

Instinctively, Stowe, Cox and some of the other members of the Kamp Corps who had been stationed in Helsinki for most of the Talvisota decided that they could not bear to hear Tanner’s speech at the Kamp.”

John Langdon Davies, another member of the corps, made for a nearby canteen operated by Elanto, the Social Democratic-owned restaurant and grocery cooperative—“which I knew to have a wireless, and which I supposed, of the usual crowd of blue-coated, worked, shop girls, typists, clerks, soldiers, skilled workmen and the rest. I went there and sat down at a little table. It was early still, and for the next quarter of an hour people came in and took their places at different tables.”

Leland Stowe had decided to do the same. For his part, Cox decided to listen to the speech in the dining hall of the Hotel Seurahuone.

Following are excerpts what the three heard and saw that memorable, sorrowful afternoon on March 13, 1940.

First Langdon-Davies:

A woman announcer stated that in a few minutes the Foreign Minister woud speak. The wireless orchestra played Martin Luther’s hymn. The hymn came to an end. It had been the same hymn that the otherwise silent crowd had sung spontaneously at Helsinki railway station when last year the negotiators had gone to Moscow.

Without further announcement, Foreign Minister Tanner began to speak. Scarcely a word had been spoken and now there was absolute silence. People stared at their plates: the Foreign Minister read out the terms of peace.

Every now and then as the true tragedy unfolded itself my eye was caught by a quick, short movement of a man or a woman suddenly brushing away tears. Twice, there was another movement.

“Of course,” the British scribe added, “I could not understand anything that was being said, except the proper names.”

It was the words Viipuri and Hanko that produced this movement. A spasmodic stifled cry, which seemed to come from almost everyone in the room, as if in response to a physical blow from an unseen weapon.

The mother and sister at my own table were now sitting with closed eyes. The girl at the next table was staring at the young man in uniform as if something incomprehensible had frightened her. Only once there was the slightest interruption. Somewhere down the room, like a pistol shot, a man’s voice snapped out, ‘Never!’”

Geoffrey Cox, at the Seurahuone, watching an equally traumatic tableau, thought about some of the Finns he had met and come to admire during the three months he had spent covering the war:

Every name came as a blow. “Viipiri.’ Gone. I thought of the fair girl on the ski jump in Rovaniemi, who had fought so willingly because she wanted to get back to Viipuri.

‘You should see the sea there in the evenings in the summer,’ she said.

‘Sortavala, Kalisalmi, Hanko…On and on went the names. Suddenly the lotta [seated next to him] burst into tears, her shoulders heaving.

Stowe, for his part, was impressed with Tanner’s self-discipline.

The foreign minister’s voice was steady and emotionless, supremely Finnish in its self-control. ‘We were compelled to accept peace,’ he said.

On all sides of me faces stared, never registering so much as a twitch of their features. Tanner’s voice went steadily on. He was enumerating the Soviet conditions. ‘My God!’ exclaimed an English-speaking girl across the table.

Two more women were crying, but without making a sound. Tanner was explaining how foreign help had failed to come in sufficient strength and in time, how the Scandinavian governments had refused passage for British and French troops.

My eyes were drawn back to the young woman by the window. Now she lay limp in her chair, her face averted toward the drawn curtains. Her shoulders were shaking slowly and ceaselessly.

****

NORTH of Helsinki in Lahti, Pekka Tillikainen, a roving reporter for YLE, was listening, half- asleep, to a portable radio when Tanner came on. “One program number flowed into another and we were half asleep,” he remembered. “Then it came. Out of our radio receiver, came the news of the disaster, wrapped in cotton wool. It came with reasoned, serious phrases.

“It brought disappointment, bitterness, sorrow. It brought this,” he later wrote, “even though there were pockets of soldiers at the front where this meant salvation from death.”

It didn’t matter: a piece of Finland died on March 13th .

****

AMONGST those immersed in sorrow and bitterness, along with her family on that bitter day, along with the rest of the thunderstruck Finnish nation, was Mai-Lis Toivenen, a lotta from Koivisto who had been an aircraft spotter during the just concluded war.

Two weeks before, Toivenen, like many of the lottas assigned to the areas overrun by the Soviets, had been honorably discharged.

She had then joined her mother, Eva, and her three younger brothers, Reijo, Martii, and Eero, at a farmhouse in Korkeakoski, a small town in central Finland whence her family had been evacuated.

As it happened, the farm where they were staying didn’t have a properly worjing radio, so the family had to hike down the road to find another place where they could hear the armistice speech. While they walking, Mai-Lis recalled in her memoir, the five of them had to pass through a clearing in the woods.

Looking up through the curtain of the anbient trees, they were greeted by the sight of another curtain, luminously hanging in the night sky: the Northern Lights.

A suspicious sort, Eva Paavola took the supernatural sight as a portent.

“The war does not end here,” she said aloud for her children to hear.”

“There will be a new war.”

****

UNFORTUNATELY, Eva’s grim premonition upon beholding the Northern Lights the night of March 13th proved correct.

Sixteen long, twisty, shadowy months later, there would indeed be another war with Russia, a longer and even costlier war, a war in which Finland was a co-belligerent with Nazi Germany.

The Continuation War, it was called. That far less glorious war would last three years.

How did that disastrous war come to pass?

How did Finland wind up on the same side as Nazi Germany, a country which a sizable proportion, despite their hatred for the Soviets, also detested?

How did it come to be that in 1942, two years into that far less noble conflict, that Adolf Hitler flew to Finland to help celebrate Gustaf Mannerheim’s 75th birthday?

What was the chain of events and decisions that led to that strange circumstance?

What was life like during those sixteen long shadowy months?

Helsinki Film Cowboys Go Global

Helsinki - “I would not be surprised,” Olli Alho, Finland’s leading film historian wrote in 1987, “if sometime in the 1990s…Finland would turn into an interesting cinema country, as Poland, Hungary, Switzerland, Sweden, and Czechoslovakia have all been in their turn.”

Traditionally, Finland’s small film industry has produced rural comedies and nature driven fantasies geared exclusively for that hermetic Nordic country of lakes and forests and midnight sun. Occasionally, a Finnish product of universal appeal will become an international hit, as Edwin Laine’s great anti-war epic, “The Unknown Soldier” did in 1954, but generally speaking Finnish film has been an acquired taste accessible only to Finnish speakers.

Unfortunately too, there has been little government support for cinema in Finland, especially as compared with neighboring Sweden, with the result that aspiring Finnish filmmakers of talent or more commercial outlook have fled to Stockholm, Paris and other points.

At least one such disaffected Finn, Renny Harlin, the director of “Die Hard II” and “The Adventures of Ford Fairlane” (whose first made-in-Finland film “Born American” was partly censored because of excessive violence” has achieved mega-success in Hollywood, while embracing what many Finns consider alien values.

Not so with Aki and Mika Kaurismaki. For the past decade this pair of Finnish writer-directors and their modest, Helsinki-based production company, Villealfa (named after Jean-Luc Godard's 1965 New Wave hit, "Alphaville"), has been issuing a steady stream of features and shorts employing Finnish settings and Finnish themes, with their own puckish twist, and garnering increasing attention from the greater cinema world.

The younger and more driven of the brothers, 33-year-old Aki, has rapidly gained a reputation as the new enfant terrible of European cinema. His 1989 feature, “Ariel”, a Finnish film noir that is a sort of cross between “High Sierra” and “Breathless” but set in the even more shadowy world of Helsinki, created a sensation at last year’s Cannes Film Festival.

More recently, “Leningrad Cowboys Go America,” his cracked paean to the American road, about a hirsute Finnish polka band turned American rock combo, opened to more rave reviews.

In addition to their own filmmaking activities, Mika and Aki are co-sponsors of the world’s northernmost film festival, the Midnight Sun Film Festival, which is held every year in the Lappish city of Sodankyla, at a time in June when the sun never sets.

And Villealfa is also active in distributing foreign films in Finland, including those of Aki’s close friend and filmic comrade, Jim Jarmusch (who makes an appearance as a used-car dealer in "Cowboys”).

Even the Finnish government is finally taking note of the Kaurismaki’s creative machinations. The government recently announced that it was adding 45 million markaa (about 12.5 million) for grants to independent filmmakers in the next year’s budget.

Escape, a key theme of traditional Finnish film, is also a central theme of both the Kaurismaki brothers’ films, although they tend to stand it on its head. Thus, in Mika’s best-known film, “Helsinki (Napoli) All Night,” made in 1985, the comic hero, a Finnish expatriate working as a cab driver in Berlin, flees to Finland while eluding the German mafia, after botching a job for them.

By contrast, Aki’s less voluble characters are usually trying to escape in the other direction - namely, out of Finland. For example, in “Ariel”, the star-crossed lovers wind up on a freighter headed for Mexico, while a Finnish rendition of “Somewhere Over the Rainbow” wafts incongruously over the credits.

The seemingly lobotomized musician-ber-serkers of “Leningrad Cowboys” also wind up in Mexico, after cutting a cacophonic swath across the American South.

Clearly, Aki Kaurismaki has mixed feelings about his homeland. The Finland depicted in his work is a country afflicted by the spiritual malaise of urban capitalism, yet leavened with humor and simplicity of a society that is still rural at heart. Thus, at its best, as in “Ariel,” or the 1986 “Shadows in Paradise”, perhaps Kaurismaki’s most accomplished work, a romance between an inexpressive garbage man and a suller supermarket cashier, is oeuvre attains a certain balladic quality.

Aki's mixed feelings about his little understood native land were also evident during a recent interview in New York, while the director was in town to promote “Cowboys” and present two of his newest works, “Match Factory Girl” and “ I Hired a Contract Killer,” to the New York Film Festival.

He confesses to a strong nostalgia for the days of Urho Kekkonen, the benevolent tyrant of a president who dominated Finland during the 1960s and 1970s - which helps explain why there is a picture of Kekkonen in almost all his films (he’s the bald one with the glasses).

“He was a man,” the laconic, leather-jacketed Finn said, referring to Kekkonen, in between bursts of his ever-present cigarette.

Since Kekkonen’s forced retirement in 1981 - just about the time Kaurismaki, a former journalist, began making films - “everything has gone downhill.” So why make films in Finland? “Because I am Finnish,” he shrugged.

And what would he do if he had more money? “I would make worse films.” End of interview.

Aki’s most frequently used actor, and the closest thing that Finland has to a film star, the irrepressible Matti Pellonpaa, is considerably more expansive than his friend, Ak; the two have known each other since growing up in the back lots of the Finnish Capital.

Indeed, an interview with the shaggy-haired, self-consciously bohemian actor, who plays Vladimir, the band manager in “Cowboys”, was something of a riot; it took place, as do most of the actor’s social and professional meetings, at the Kosmos, a kind of Finnish Brown Derbycum-hangout where the young Helsinki intelligentsia congregates on weekday evenings. Pellonpaa and Kaurismaki are main attractions.

“I am a Communist because I am not a Communist!” the tipsy thespian boomed, while receiving a steady stream of solicitous female fans. “There are no small roles - there are only small actors!”

Subsequent, soberer exchanges revealed the 39-year-old actor to be seriously devoted to his craft, to the Kaurismakis, and to Finland, in about that order. Pellonpaa attributes his success, in part, to his dual training as an actor and a cameraman; indeed, he began working for the Kaurismakis as a key grip.

Nevertheless, he assigns the greatest part of the credit to Aki Kaurismaki’s faith in him. “Who would've thought that I could become a star with this face,” Pellonpaa said, smiling and pointing at his grizzled visage.

The actor’s success is a relative thing. He earns only about $30,000 a year, still not enough to afford his own apartment in super-expensive Helsinki. And he doesn’t have an agent; there aren’t many agents in Finland - yet. And Pellonpaa, who likes the coziness of the Finnish film scene, such as it is, would like to keep it that way. As far as he is concerned, he gets enough attention at the Kosmos.

“I want to be an actor - not a poster!’he exhorted, once again in his cups, before sliding back to his table and waiting coterie.